Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | chj's commentslogin

I think there is a x64 patch you need to apply


Probably auto rejected by Claude screening agent. Nothing PERSONAL.


My laptop screamed after I played around in the redux demo. Must be something like infinite loop.


My algorithm to detect / resolve collisions has a bug in it. In some cases, a system will be displaced on the right, then on the left, then on the right... until it reaches a maximum number of allowed displacements. When it happens, moving a system feels very slow.

I intend to fix that bug (eh!) and I'm also thinking about moving this costly algorithm in web workers (+ parallelize it).


Is it possible to find a certain encoded formula of PI inside the PI digits itself, given its length?


Do you mean in the computed 202T digits of Pi, on in in the infinite sequence of Pi digits? In case of the latter: s̶u̶r̶e̶, probably, if Pi is normal, any finite sequence of digits is contained somewhere in Pi, so it would contain (in encoded form) any closed formula and any program, book, or piece of music ever written.

E: As the comments have pointed out, this requires the conjecture that Pi is normal to be true, was has not been proven or disproven yet.


I thought this wasn't actually mathematically established - the related property would be whether or not pi is normal.


Is this known to be true? Its obviously not true for arbitrary irrational numbers


I meant the computed digits. Probably unlikely


Isn't it the way perl scripts write their documentation? I don't know what makes it good for personal knowledge systems from reading the introduction


Perl's POD, yes. But you're right! The spec authors are Perl folx, and this is clearly derivative. What's kind of interesting is that POD stands for "Plain Old Documentation" and then there's a "lite" version of it... so "lite-r Plain Old Documentation" --- I don't see a clear summary of the differences, though.


> I know several world class programmers, and interestingly, the commonality among them is that they all seem to use Vim as their code editor. Many people I know who think of themselves as world class programmers use Emacs.

Curious who and who?


I've known many world-class programmers who use Emacs, among them Kalman Reti and Steve Summit.

Most of the diehard Vim users I encountered were kind of in the DUVASWUV camp (DHH Uses Vim And So We Use Vim), i.e., they came to it as part of the whole Rails memeplex. That said, vi(m) and Emacs used to share the throne as the canonical Unix wizard editors because they were nearly ubiquitously available, consistent in UI across the decades, and they rewarded proficiency (each in their own way). It was a reliable assumption that a halfway decent programmer in the open-source tradition would be quite familiar with one or the other, if not both.


Vim? I remember DHH was the premier TextMate evangelist. All his videos were TextMate only.


Being a Rubyist and using vim is definitely a thing. Looks like I was off about DHH being the origin. It certainly wasn't Matz, he uses (and contributed to) Emacs.


he still uses textmate afaik


Every android phone maker in China has to curate its own app store, not because it is fun, but google decided to play hard ball. Not saying it's google's fault.


With co-processors, he's saying.


At one point, I even went back to Win10. But it's become so bad. Now I find myself a happy mate desktop user.


Wow, John Mearsheimer is now a Russian propagandist? You can disagree, but you may want to listen to one of your best thinkers in international politics.


This fellow was completely and utterly wrong about Putin, saying that he'd never invade.

How can someone be proven so wrong about their life's work and still be called "one of your best thinkers in international politics."?


He predicted this crisis in 2014, and I think he has been quite consistent on saying Putin will act, just that Putin will not occupy Ukraine. Now there is the possibility of Russia taking the eastern part, but his main thesis is still valid: the west should leave Ukraine as a buffer state.

https://www.mearsheimer.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Why-t...


> He predicted this crisis in 2014...

The article you linked was written after Russia had already invaded and annexed part of Ukraine, so it's not a very impressive prediction.


"If you really want to wreck Russia, what you should do is to encourage it to try to conquer Ukraine. Putin is much too smart to try to do that." John Mearsheimer, 2015.

https://twitter.com/SKalyvas/status/1498073083197931529


Today you and me can debate what "conquer" means, but if policy makers follow his advice, this war won't happen at all. I think that's what really matters.


Nonsense! Putin had always planned to rebuild the USSR. Ukraine, Moldova,... he was going to get them back piece by piece.

Putin's argument that Nato was a threat is just a distraction. There's nothing Nato could do if Ukraine joined Nato that Nato couldn't already do without Ukraine.

Mearsheimer's argument that Russia should be left alone to violate the sovereignty of her neighbours is just bonkers. Thank goodness he was ignored.


Source?


"If you really want to wreck Russia, what you should do is to encourage it to try to conquer Ukraine. Putin is much too smart to try to do that." John Mearsheimer, 2015.

https://twitter.com/SKalyvas/status/1498073083197931529


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: