Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | cderg's commentslogin

It's quite common in electric cars these days. Makes driving much more pleasant, and once you get used to it there's minimal need to swap back to the brake pedal.


> Define “woman?” It’s easy - it’s the traditional gender role for people AFAB.

This redefinition of "woman" comes from a fundamentally sexist and conservative perspective.


If you actually knew any gender-non-conformant butch women, you'd know they are overwhelmingly trans allies.


Yes, precisely! Modern conservatism is almost primarily characterized by the way it holds traditional gender roles as sacred! Gender unorthodoxy is their main objection to progressiveness!

That’s the reason any of this is even an issue, conservatives still think cows are sacred, queers are hungry for steak!


Doesn't Samsung use AI models to fill in images of the moon with higher resolution detail? Not sure if this comparison makes sense given that the astrophotography device almost certainly won't be doing that.

Some technical detail from an older thread: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35172190


Or just generate the thing with AI in the first place. Almost as romantic and you don't get cold.


You can stop that by turning scene optimiser off.

https://www.samsung.com/uk/support/mobile-devices/how-galaxy...


Gonna be some wild conspiracies some day in the future, when humanity has altered the moon visibly but 'good old phones from way back in the day' take photos that "clearly" show no change to the moon.


Those phones will be long dead at that point, as well as the cloud services they depend on.


Those are relatively niche beliefs even on the left. There's a difference between what is said by politicians and what the general public think.


Loud minority for sure. Republicans are right about biological sex being real (it's based off of gamete size, not chromosomes exactly), but that's more of a broken clock being right twice a day.

Gender ideology had its run and is past the high water mark. When it's gone, Republicans won't even have that hobby horse.


It's not a left/right divide, it's a violent/non-violent divide. There've been people across the political spectrum on the violent side, it's not correlated to the left or right.


I'll give credit to all the folks on the left condemning the attack. I think Cenk is a fantastic and refreshing example of that. But the the political persecution and violence is overwhelmingly coming from the left.


> individuals and attacks associated with left-wing causes are less likely to be violent

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9335287/

> right-wing actors are significantly more violent than left-wing actors

https://ccjs.umd.edu/feature/umd-led-study-shows-disparities...

> Numbers [of deaths] for right-wing extremist violence are far higher, with numerous high-profile terrorist attacks as well as lower-level assaults, vandalism, and other forms of violence. Since the 9/11 terrorist attacks, far-right extremists have killed 130 people in the United States, more than any other political cause, including jihadists.

https://www.brookings.edu/articles/countering-organized-viol...


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: