Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | calmworm's comments login

Obvious how?

If only they had a $1.50 hamburger option!

This is cool but I was hoping to see one (or more) thrown, bounce around, then see the software piece together a 3D sort of layout of everything it captured. Excited to see v2!


Job interview? You might be surprised at the number of us who don’t code for a job.


I'd bet most people on this forum program professionally.


I would take that bet.


Me too.


Somebody tested people on Hacker News to evaluate programming competency.

This was part of a larger evaluation comparing the Hacker News population to people on Reddit programming subreddits.

Here is a very heated discussion of the result:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33293522

It appears that Hacker News is perhaps NOT populated by the programming elite. In contrast, there are real wizards on Reddit.

Surprising, I know.


Not surprising given how bad the takes here are and how many of the users here are dumb kids right out of college who are aspiring founders.


Unnecessarily negative. Maybe rethink it.


Not surprised there would be a “heated” discussion as a result of this one link, that measured only those who engaged it, and how? I opened the link, hit Submit just to see what would happen… now the percentage of HN users who are competent programmers is even fewer than before, by that metric.


It was always going to be a long, slow decline. Not sure why anyone is surprised by any of these news stories.


Completely inaccurate analogy using IASIP and Philly. lol.


Happened to me too. 666260


666260

Had it for many years then someone “hacked it” and took it. That was the end of it for me.


Looks like your account has been deleted too https://icq.im/666260/en


Unfortunate.


Yeah I did not realize how much people like to have low number IDs. I signed up very early on but my friends bailed so I did too. No idea what even happened to that account and the email addresses I used at the time are also lost after being abandoned. Given average password sophistication at the time, I'm sure it got hacked/hijacked at some point.


I didn’t consider that it was a low number, just posted because I remembered it. But I’m also now realizing that wasn’t actually my ID, it was the middle six numbers of a UPC on a 1 1/4 oz 25 cent bag of Doritos in the early 90’s. Oops.


Agreed. Not only does it not sound like SJ, at all, it’s someone else’s actual voice. Would this voice actor then be barred from doing voice acting? None of it makes sense.


>Would this voice actor then be barred from doing voice acting?

That's where this has always gotten odd to me. There's obvious impersonation, sure, but what if this same actress wanted to e.g. be the Major in a new Ghost in the Shell dub? Is she responsible for making sure everyone who hires her very definitely isn't hiring her as a soundalike if she wants her work to get released?

I'm sure it would be fine in reality, but if saying "her" (when advertising an app you can have a conversation with) is enough to make this impersonation, then the same logic says she's barred from certain roles (or categories of role) because someone more famous got there first.


Bette Midler sued Ford for hiring an impersonator. She lost in the circuit court and won on appeal. The fact pattern in the appeal was that Ford had explicitly asked their actress to "sound as much as possible like Bette Midler". That's exactly what didn't happen here: not only did they not ask the actor to impersonate SJ or her character from "Her", they didn't even mention SJ. The actor used her natural speaking voice.


However knowing saying such a thing would be problematic they would be looking for workarounds. Considering they did giver her directions and the end result was closer to ‘her’ than the voice accesses natural voice they didn’t need to ask for a specific impersonation for people to make the connection.

I’m thinking of a number, bigger, no smaller. Keep playing the game and the end result is arbitrarily close to the number you’re thinking of.

The search space for generic seductive female voice is huge and they happened to end up with one that objectively sounds like someone they tried to recruit. They can’t argue random chance at this point.


Why, on any device… or group of devices you own and/or operate.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: