I doubt you can force them to provide the service with the original terms, but you might be able to ask for a (partial) refund. If not today, after a week of verbal abuse they will receive for this online.
It depends where you’re located. In the EU they have to honor the contract you entered, but presumably there is a clause that they can prematurely terminate the contract without cause and give you all of your money back (from the start of the contract).
As I understand it this bypasses a "please do not read" level of protection on cheap microcontrollers, not an actual secure element, so only those secrets are impacted that were not properly protected to begin with.
Firefox on Fedora 43 here, no joy, and indeed, randomly broken on Linux (too).
[edit] Okey, so installing the complete Google Noto Fonts family resolved this issue. But I still don't know if relying on a script with almost no font support is any better than what the OP did.
Given the context of Node here will allow experimental type-stripping and will not be doing things like import rewriting, Typescript's decision here to focus on "users write .js in imports because that's how the type-stripped file should look" seems like the right call to me. Less work for a type-stripper because Typescript can already check if there is a .ts or .d.ts file for you if you use .js imports everywhere.
