Docker on M1 is a pain in the ass if you have to focus on x86 instead of ARM. Non arm docker builds take much much longer to the point that my 2016 Mac is faster than my M1. But if you live in arm land it's fine. Unfortunately, that's not me so I spend most of my time Ssh'd into an x86 Linux machine.
Because you had done even a single Google search and turned up, for example this paper: https://aclanthology.org/2022.ltedi-1.6.pdf titled "Detoxifying Language Models with a Toxic Corpus" (Yoon A Park and Frank Rudzicz at Toronto), which while not exactly groundbreaking, is a well-footnoted exploration of how to use adversarial or quasi-adversarial training ensembles in a language setting?
To be clear, I'm aiming for a tiny amount of snark/sarcasm above, the minimum amount. I want to provide a useful answer, but I'm a mechanism designer by trade and incentives matter. Don't do that.
The rest of my snark is at the offices of The Facebook, where people smarter than me are doing work that no one writing this comment, including and especially myself, are intellectually or creatively capable of ;)
I'm going on the permanent record under my real name with shit like: "Fogging up the windshield with a bunch of feigned alarm about AI apocalypse but ramming the R&D through at full thrusters is a dick move in either case."
I'd love to persuade you to help out! But if you're not interested, just declining to participate is really the move here.
Yes, because each decision is based on a previous decision, often made by someone else. Sometimes, someone 5 steps back made an awful decision which necessitates making another decision that may also be wrong, but wrong in a way that could leave the next person able to make a correct one.
If I walk into a room and someone asks "how do I deploy this app to the edge" there's 1000 answers that will either be right or wrong depending on decisions about that apps design that were made long ago but will still impact how I have to deploy it.
No the strategy is associate drugs with minorities to make being a minority illegal.
Ehrlichman told Baum. "We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders, raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."
This is an unverified quote from someone last in office in 1969, about president Nixon who he may have had a grudge against. But if so, which minority is being targeted with the cool-whip ban?
My apologies, I appear to have misunderstood the comment chain. The commenter saying that the whip cream law discriminates against minorities is incorrect.
Prohibition itself does discriminate against minorities but age regulation does not, in fact age regulation of psychoactive substances is a good step in the right direction away from hard-line prohibitionist policies.
