The quality of reddit's data is different from other data I encounter online.
It represents information more closely related to people's lives. People share information there that is closely related to the topic of the subreddit. This may not always be the case, but even though I spend much, much less time on reddit than I did in 2011, many, many people are contributing to this day.
That spigot of connection to the real world through text sounds valuable to AI based on TFA. I feel the oil analogy would be about the quality and the ease of extraction of the stake
I think different senses of responsibility are under discussion
The parent comment I believe was saying that we do not orchestrate other people's emotions and you are saying that we do impact other people's emotions and both can be true
That looks like it specifically calls out the slant that different sources report with for a given topic. It's not quite the same as having a reliable source without the slant (if possible), but it might be the next-best thing, and/or the most realistic solution to the problem right now.
I used to watch a podcast called Unfilter (which has ended now), and what I liked about it was that they took a story and played clips from various stations to compare the coverage side-by-side, like that website does with text.
The fee comes from the payment processor. There's no way to avoid it while providing credit card services without starting your own payment processing company (at which point you're then eating those costs directly).
FedNow should help in the longer term as non-credit card payment methods show up that use it, but it's still not going to get to the realm of 10¢ micropayments (the service has a flat $0.045 per transaction fee, and companies still have to then consider their own service cost overheads on top of that).
Location to location quality is variable. I am very much a big tent, easy-to-please person when it comes to food and the nearest Cheesecake Factory to me has been a big letdown
That might be like a chat with itself, it seems trivial to me, implementation wise and it seems nigh impossible ethics wise
If I were Timnit Gebru and I saw that Google was trying to implement reflection in an AI when i felt the ethics engineering hadn’t caught up to the software engineering, I might quit
For those new to the Summa, generally speaking, it is good to read an article starting with the On the Contrary and the I Answer That, and then proceed on to the Objections and Replies
It represents information more closely related to people's lives. People share information there that is closely related to the topic of the subreddit. This may not always be the case, but even though I spend much, much less time on reddit than I did in 2011, many, many people are contributing to this day.
That spigot of connection to the real world through text sounds valuable to AI based on TFA. I feel the oil analogy would be about the quality and the ease of extraction of the stake