Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | beart's comments login

I'm not an expert on these things, so I'm asking in good faith; what significant anti monopoly policies have been enacted in the US in recent history?

Here are some successful companies with odd-sounding names: Google, GoDaddy, Survey Monkey, Nvidia, Caterpillar, Coca-Cola

When a stakeholder comes back 6 months after project launch complaining about missing/incorrect features, I can't use throwaway code to prove the project was built to spec.

More recently than never, unfortunately.


This is not correct. The election system changes regularly, and in different ways all over the country.


The Electoral College was established during the Constitutional Convention… in 1787.

Sure, there have been changes since then, but it’s probably always been optimal to go for many states as opposed to the handful of biggest ones.


Substitute any other pass-time for video games and I think most folks feel differently.

A pick-up game of basketball

A weekend mountain bike race

A corn-hole tournament at your local bar.

Someone cheating in any of these contexts would typically be upsetting. No one likes a cheater.

Video games are different because you can't call them out on it in real-time. You don't usually have any way to prove it. You also can't really escape it because there might be another cheater in the next lobby. In person, you have a lot more power or control over the situation (typically).


I have to call today to cancel my charter cable... I would sign up for the tv service more frequently (seasonally), if I could cancel it with a simple click. However, since they require a phone call so they can try to market to me, this will be the last time I ever subscribe in my life.


Your first post did not indicate discord refused to assist authorities, but that users praised a violent act.


Indeed. GP's original post - ironically prefaced with "Before you make too many assumptions" - implied the reasoning was something entirely unrelated to what it actually was about.


HN rules are that I should assume you read the article.


I did read the article. I'm just pointing out the likely reason that all these comments seem to be talking past one another.

The quote you chose doesn't seem to reinforce the point you are making.


Technically there's nothing saying that in the guidelines.


I suspect it was meant tongue in cheek, I had a good chuckle with it when I read it.


> It's not "that" expensive to donate to USC to get the donor boost assuming your kid isn't an idiot - it's just a couple million total over a consistent period (5-15 years depending on when your kid is starting).

That is a staggering amount of money!

> According to research published by the National Library of Medicine and the Social Security Administration, the lifetime earnings of the average U.S. citizen (over 50 years from age 20 to 69) vary substantially, depending on the various factors we will cover in this article, with an overall average median lifetime earnings of $1,850,000 for men and $1,100,200 for women.

https://www.theknowlesgroup.org/blog/average-american-lifeti...


To be fair, good private schools ($60k/yr ) and their associated activities easily add up to a million over 12 years. It's a lot of money, but not unheard of, even among upper middle class families.

At the same time. If you invest 2 million in an index fund when they're 10, then it'll be ~$40 million by the time the kid is 40 yr old. So, donating it to USC might be a pretty bad investment unless 2 million is a genuinely small amount for OP.


…you live in a different world than most of us.

I don’t know if a single k-12 private school that has tuition anywhere near that in the South Bay Area, except Harker for the upper grades only. Presentation, Bellermine, etc. are all half that.


The truly elite private schools in the Bay (Castilleja, Harker, Athenian, Stuart/Convent Hall, Town, Hamlin, Menlo, College Prep, Head-Royce) cost around $60k-90k/yr per student.

> you live in a different world than most of us

Probably.

Benefits of a dual income household with both earners making mid-6 figs base and fairly hefty bonuses (and equity), and both of us reached this point by our mid-20s.

This is a very common household structure in the Bay Area.

Your neighbor might be HNW or UHNW and you wouldn't even know it.


> This is a very common household structure in the Bay Area.

But not typical for startup employees.


What is HNW?


High Net Worth. Ultra High Net Worth.


HNW is High Net Worth Individual

And UHNW is Ultra High Net Worth Individual


> So, donating it to USC might be a pretty bad investment

It is.

Before AB1780 it something we heavily considered only because we're Asian American and Asian American admissions at top private like Yale and Harvard have fallen after the Supreme Court's AA ruling, while legacy admissions skyrocketed.

Now that AB1780 exists, and will most likely have teeth in the next 30 years, there's no reason to partake in that zero sum game anymore.

> 2 million is a genuinely small amount for OP.

It comes out to top Bay Area private school tuition for 2 kids over a 16-20 year timeline.


apologize for the tangent but my cousin and her husband (both asian american, both harvard alumni) chose to move back to our hometown in Seattle so they could send their kids to lakeside, the same school bill gates went to.

i assume to increase their chances of getting into harvard. back of the envelope math works out to be $715k for their 5-12 education which may be more bang for your buck but also the college entrance strategy is not so much based on donor contribution and more on target school selection.


Are you lost? This is a forum basically exclusively for people working in tech, a disproportionate fraction of whom are tech founders. If you're in this line of work and making anything vaguely resembling median income, you've fucked up terribly.


It seems like you are trying to insult me and I'm not sure why. However, I will address the issue you raised regardless. The typical tech worker makes far less than you seem to believe.

For example, The Bureau of Labor Statistics indicates median pay for tech workers in 2023 was $104K - https://www.bls.gov/ooh/computer-and-information-technology


His tone isn't great, but he isn't wrong.

HN skews Bay Area.

BLS didn't normalize the above data to show the Bay Area where it's fairly common to break $400-500k TC by your late 20s/early 30s.

Furthermore, at least in the Bay Area Asian American community, both spouses are working these roles (or adjacent high paying roles like Medicine, Dentistry, High Finance, etc).


Is USC that hard to get into ?

My understanding is that Stanford, Berkeley, Caltech and UCLA are more selective and UCSD has better academics.

If you're a selfmade tech founder millionaire......maybe have some faith in the caliber of your own child ?


Nowadays, all of those schools are hard to get into.


What changed ?

US population is stable, enrollment has increased, and all of these universities have been prestigious for a while.

I understand that UCs have pivoted to pseudo-private school status by increasing tuition and international student admissions have gotten more competitive. CS has gotten harder to get in as a major, but has the university as a whole gotten more selective ?

I can't see why things would suddenly get a lot harder for undeclared domestic students. Has the domestic rat-race intensified to such a degree ?


Several things have changed:

1. The Common Application pervasiveness. When I applied to college (many moons ago), I applied to five schools. Now it's not unheard of for kids to apply to 15-25 schools.

2. While the US population is stable there are more kids going to college than 30 years ago.

3. The "resume" of students is much stronger. As a kid I knew someone who got into MIT whose highest math course was HS Calculus, AB equivalent, but not an AP course -- people weren't surprised at the time. I think you'd be hardpressed to find kids who get in with that now. I know kids who have completed Calc BC as HS freshman. Now that's not common, but it's not super rare either. And what HS kid hasn't created their own non-profit? Or published a paper(s)? The bar just keeps rising. Honestly I don't think its sustainable. HS kids applying to Ivies have better credentials than pretty much all of our country's leaders!


I doubt you have ever worked in an early stage tech startup.


You must be fun at parties.


I think the old adage, "don't let perfect be the enemy of good" applies here. Some battles are fought one excruciating step at a time


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: