Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | bcb_1000's commentslogin

The crazier part is a reddit post on AWS was made for someone releasing a $3 a month closed source version of this, that received a lot of traction, but a bit of flack for being closed source was made 3 hours before the first commit. This guy 100% took the idea and the open source parts and recreated it to post here. Look at the readme and compare them. It is almost a 1:1 copy of the other. This dude is hella sketch. And if this is getting traction we are cooked as developers.


That someone would be you (I saw that Reddit post: https://www.reddit.com/r/aws/comments/1q3ik9z/i_made_a_termi...). I'm not sure I would describe the collective response as having "a lot of traction"; most respondents panned both the price and the closed-source nature of the offering.

What you're learning here is that there's not really a viable market for simple, easily replicable tools. People simply won't pay for them when they can spin up a Claude session, build one in a few hours (often unattended!), and post it to GitHub.

Real profit lies in real value. In tooling, value lies in time or money saved, plus some sort of moat that others cannot easily cross. Lick your wounds and keep innovating!


Please dont open source your code if you’re going to call people hella sketch for deriving from it. Did he violate your license? Attack that action, not the person doing open source.


To add since the poster is being confusing: this is the GitHub repo for their project: https://github.com/fells-code/seamless-glance-distro

It is indeed not open sourced, as the repo only has a README and a download script. The "open source" they are referring to I think is the similar README convention.

Which makes this comment they made on Reddit especially odd: https://www.reddit.com/r/aws/comments/1q3ik9z/comment/nxpq7t...

> And the folder structure is almost an exact mirror of mine

Even though Rust has patterns on how to organize source code, similar folder structure is unlikely, particularly since the original code is not public so it would have to be one hell of a coincidence. (the funniest potential explanation for this would be that both people used the same LLMs to code the TUI app)


“Someone”


This guy took this idea from my post on reddit and made an open source version. It is def just ran through some agent, I can tell because look at how he defines regions? Look how he defines credentials, it doesn't make coherent sense. He read my reddit post saw the interest and is trying to run with it. Thats crazy.


This guy stole this idea and basically the whole code base from another developer and ran it through an LLM to recreate it.


I think you’re vastly overestimating how difficult this type of application would be to an LLM. There’s no need to steal another code base…isn’t yours closed source, anyways?

You could probably get 90% of the way there with a prompt that literally just says:

> Create a TUI application for exploring deployed AWS resources. Write it in Rust using the most popular TUI library.



I didn’t take code or reverse-engineer anything from that Reddit project, and I wasn’t aware of it when I started.

I’ve been a long-term k9s user, and the motivation was simply: “I wish I had something like k9s, but for AWS.” That’s a common and reasonable source of inspiration.

A terminal UI for AWS is a broad, well-explored idea. Similar concepts don’t imply copied code. In this case, even the UIs are clearly different—the interaction model and layout are not the same.

The implementation, architecture, and UX decisions are my own, and the full commit history is public for anyone who wants to review how it evolved.

If there’s a specific piece of code you believe was copied, I’m happy to look at it. Otherwise, it’s worth checking what someone actually built before making accusations based on surface-level assumptions.


It’s pretty clear it was your post/project you reference, but how do you know he got inspiration from you? Did OP post on your Reddit post, confirming they were even aware of it?

Creating a tool via a LLM based on a similar idea isn’t quite stealing.


Making those accusations while hiding the fact that the “other developer” was you is extremely disingenuous.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: