What happens is that you in fact lend part of your brain to all the data that you see on your screen. You don't realize it but your subconscious mind sees senses a lot of stuff your conscious mind is not aware about. Until you see it after you just talked about it thinking it was your idea and panic.
What you actually talk about with people (excluding maybe the proffesional stuff) is mundane stuff you see on your screens, newspapers, billboards, etc.
International law always sanctioned a state's intervention in another state's affairs. In addition to this very well known fact by jurists, there is also recent works in the field contradicting your position.
"International law prohibits states from intervening in the internal and external affairs of
other states [...] as coercion-as-control, an action materially depriving the victim
state of its ability to control its sovereign choices. This may be done even through acts like
cyber operations that the victim state is entirely unaware of." [1]
If a bicycle hits a pedestrian and the pedestrian was on cycling path in The Netherlands, who's fault is it? If the pedestrian gets a broken arm who pays for medical services?
If NL laws are anywhere close to the rest of European countries: the bike is responsible. The pedestrian is never responsible, unless they do something absurd like jumping in front of the bike without leaving any way to react to the bike.
>If the pedestrian gets a broken arm who pays for medical services?
The... Insurance of whoever is responsible? I know this concept is weird to the US, but personal insurances in Europe are about covering the damage you inflict on others first, then eventually you. They're also mandatory. In addition, well, a broken arm is not a financial catastrophe in Europe. Should it prevent you from doing your job, the insurance also covers that.
hey! so i got a cdn for video made of 4 bare metals and 2 are newer and more powerful so i give them each 2 ip addresses from the 6 addresses replied by dns for the respective a record. but from a very diverse pool of devices (proprietary set top boxes, smart tv sets, mobile clients ios and android, web browsers, etc) i still get ~40% of traffic on the older servers instead of the expected 33% given 2 out of 6 ip addresses resolved as dns a records for these hosts. why?
OMG, this is surveillance society, i want to be able to run over anything and not be held accountable, such restriction of my liberty and privacy is unbearable /s
