I have landed a new job recently and during the job search I also did statistics.
For context I am 30 year old french, had my one and only job for 6 years doing
PHP (sf2, postgres, redis, solr, rest), I have a 2 year degree where in europe
most people have a 3 to 5 year degree.
Here is my statistics to applying to ads on indeed:
- Cover letter doesn't increase my chances of having a reply.
- Changing my CV after the feedback of a recruiter (he asked me to lie by
omission) didn't improved my chances.
- I don't apply to company I recognize the name. If I do lots of people do too
therefor there is a lots of better candidates than me and the company can
afford to run me through many interviews.
- I don't apply to company that do more than 1 interview, they have too much
time on their hands to find a reason not to hire me.
- I don't apply to company that specifically ask for a 3 to 5 years degree even if
I fit the rest of the requirements.
This last job search (the one that landed my first job 7 years ago wasn't a
bliss either) made me feel extremely under-confident in my capacity to grow my
career even having a job.
I suspect english words starting with 'ph' come from french, french words with 'ph' used 'ph' instead of 'f' (same sound) to emphase the fact the word borrow greek root (but who care the word come from greek, does it make it easier to learn? one more shitty rule of french).
Granted I don't have hard data on the "ph" fact, the source is pretty credible in my opinion. The fact appeared in an article written for the British Council, co-authored by Martha Peraki, a Linguistics PhD recipient from American University.
Heuristically, the "rule" passes the eyeball test: philosophy, physical, photo, phrase, philanthropy, phobia, phage, phalange, phalanx, phallic, phase, pharmacy, phantom, phenomenon, phone, photons, photosynthesis, physician, physique, phytoplankton, so on and so forth
in parser.c