strace shows that the sleep program uses clock_nanosleep, which is theoretically "passive." However, if the host suspends and then wakes up after the sleep period should have ended, it continues as if it were "active."
Genuine question: why reads it "1-100" as 1 .. -100? Google is (was) good at that even when I think it was taught by pure statistics. I never saw people would mean by that, only by bots. Does bots have too much influence?
It just needs another service for making tests... But that probably will has the same base of the AI, so yuck.
For making *good* test by yourself, I think you still need to know that code *very* well.
Curl is very widely used and has a ton of features which means that it gets a lot of CVEs, but their severity is often significantly overstated for users outside of specific niche configurations - for marketing purposes, it’s nice to be able to say that you found a HIGH in libcurl without mentioning that it only affected Windows domain authentication on ARM. The lead developer has written about this providing a lot of noise without much tangible security benefit:
Previously I worked on an open source project that pulled in many third party libraries. Users would run their corpo vulnerability scanners on the project and find dependencies with open CVEs and demand fixes, not understanding that in our usage of the libraries, the vulnerability is not exposed.
I think in 4 years, we had users open roughly 50 issues like this, which corresponded to exactly 0 real world exploitable issues.
A central vuln DB makes sense for sysadmins, but too many make it the end-all-be-all.
I think this ends up devolving to Goodhart’s law: once CVEs became marketing, a ton of people had a huge incentive to game their stats at the expense of everyone else’s time.
I have no idea how to put it in words and I am far from bashing it, I like it, admire it.. but.. it seems vaguely divergent styles, stil what it bugs me after seeing lots of these images, it seems "boring" (again i don't know how to phrase it).. if i see an image in the wild i can guess it is generated by midjourney.
>after seeing lots of these images, it seems "boring"
Midjourney very much has a style and like looking at the front page of ArtStation while the images are of a high “quality” in the technique sense, the artistry of them is pretty low.
Very rare to see an image that will surprise you on ArtStation, just a sea of orcs, elves, guns and spaceships in the same “painted” yet completely uninteresting style. Same for a MidJourney output, all very safe, all the same tricks to provide “impact” yet all utterly boring.
Pornography is not the only thing that's censored there. Any kind of nudity, violence, blood, some politicians and other things like that are banned too.
I know exactly what you mean even though I basically disagree. While in some pictures, one can really "tell" by picking up on some unconscious "artifacts" or patterns. Uncanny valley stuff. On the other hand most are just too good, which I egocentrically assume is what you also mean. (or at least it makes sense from my perspective)
This leads me to believe that a lot of people may share your view and thus steer the upcoming popular visual styles into the opposite directions (the pendulum). Maybe more abstract / gritty / grunge / minimalist or messy. I've seen a similar development in music and it steered the popular audience to the stoner rock genre for a while, simply for being the opposite of the currently popular in multiple ways.
Midjourney gives little control to artists and straight up ignores prompts. You can't customise it with different loras and checkpoints. There's no controlnet. It's tuned to "look cool" not to output what's actually in the prompt.
For example - if you prompt "low poly castle, isometric". The output wont't be low poly or isometric, but something that "looks cool".
This is why people are hyped about the new SD XL. It understands prompts much better than previous iterations of SD and Midjourney. And it can be customised and extended. Can't wait for the full release, Controlnet XL and other extensions.
Would be fun if someone made an online game where you try to distinguish AI and human generated art. I'm confident I would do much better than chance, but I'd be curious to see if people can reliably get 90%+
How do those DBs compare? I mean how am I can read these graphs? Like is mariadb slower on wsl or others have some kind bottleneck slowing them on all cases to near equal performance?
You may wanna take a look on DB engine benchmarks from Percona. Those from phoronix.com doesn't try compare DBs, but environments where those DB/applications run.
