Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | aryc19's commentslogin

I've used nreal air.

The good: - Great form factor - Image quality for screen mirroring is great - Display has good brightness - Decent speakers

The bad: - Nebula (AR software that allows projecting multiple screens) has a worse image quality (I see some flickering). It's also buggy (e.g. it doesn't work on latest MacOS) - Slightly heavy. You would start feeling the weight on your ears after wearing it for an hour or so. - When screen mirroring an M1 Mac, the display settings on Mac doesn't allow you to resize the screen. It works on an Intel Mac though.

Eventually I decided to return it as I want to wait for the device to mature and I don't really have a strong need for AR glasses at this time. I'd be looking forward to their next version.

I think the current AR glasses (Nreal, Rokid, etc) are probably at the same level of maturity as smart watches when they first came out in the early to mid 2010s.


Really helpful, thank you! Can't tell you how many times I've had this in my amazon cart.


I asked "Dumbledore" a question. It gave the answer along with a "learn more" button which ended up being a link to PDF of the book. It shows up only for one particular question. Seems like a bug?


So what are some good tools to obfuscate style?


Because incentives. The beauty of crypto/web3 is to reward the service providers with incentives for their services. Nobody is going to provide things for free and even if they do it won't be sustainable in the long run.


It looks promising. I was going to create an account to try it but then I stopped. Their privacy policy states I would have to send an email to delete my account data. Why do people make it harder to remove an account when the sign up process so easy?


I mean, the alternative costs $2,000/mo.


I have the same process on my site. The reason is that it is such a risky operation that you want to have a human in the middle as a safeguard from accidental deletion.

Account cancellations and so on are automatic of course, but anything that can’t be rolled back requires human input.


It guess it's not hard to put a deletion timer and send warning emails before actual deletion. Not every service out there requires you to send an email to delete your account.


And if you make a mistake there, your whole database evaporates and the business dies.

It is possible, but it is expensive and risky to do it right. In my case there were perhaps five people that requested data deletion over the span of 8 years the site was working. Features that are so rarely used you don’t automate.

Granted, I could’ve added a button that would send the e-mail automatically. It just honestly never crossed my mind - will implement it in future sites :)


I'm really looking forward to using this project when it's stable. I briefly experimented with their Python SDK to try and record metrics but their documentation seemed either out of date or non-existent for some features. I'll wait for them to reach 1.0 in the hope that the documentation gets better and existing issues are resolved.


disclaimer: i'm an otel maintainer (specifically on community/web stuff!)

to echo some points from comments, I'm painfully aware of the state of the official documentation. I'm actually in the process of revamping the site to provide a framework for docs in each language to try and alleviate this. I expect it to be ready by 1.0.


Do you think it's better than workflowy?


What benefits do you see in fish when compared to zsh?


I would say fish is to zsh like what zsh is to bash.

More seriously, for a start: good defaults, highlighting and autosuggestion built-in, parameters search with help and completion... (but it's not Posix).


Regarding POSIX, I've been using Fish for about 4 years now.

POSIX always comes up, how it's a deal breaker.I want to mention that I build all my scripts as POSIX as I can or using Bash extensions. You keep having Bash/ZSH on your machine, so you can still use your scripts and don't miss anything. Shebang's keeps working,

    #!/bin/sh
    #!/bin/bash
    #!/bin/zsh
Personally, I actually don't change my default shell (chsh step). I simply set my terminal to use the fish command instead of invoking the default shell.

    - Gnome Terminal, there's a Title and Command tab. You can set a custom command there. Just put the path to fish
    - Terminal.app, Preferences > Profiles > Shell > Run command
    - iTerm.app, Preferences > Profiles > General > Command
    - Tmux, on your .tmux.conf `set -g default-shell /usr/local/bin/fish`
It's more portable for me that way.


I was also interested about it and from my research, Fish has two major differences:

- it enables the cool functionality out of the box, so unlike zsh you don't need to have large configuration file to enable everything

- it is not afraid to break bash compatibility to fix confusing scripting issues, so fish most likely will fail when executing a bash script, but writing scripts in fish should be more enjoyable


This video explains the double slit experiment using probabilities and it's the only one that made sense to me without bringing in quantum mystery: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iyN27R7UDnI&feature=share

It also goes on to explain the delayed choice quantum eraser experiment but I don't think that's quite convincing.


One way to scale up / down workers in Buildbot is to have more workers defined in the configuration than actually needed with generic names (e.g. worker1, worker2, etc) and then start / stop them when required.

Agree with you on the waterfall UI regression. It seems console view is preferred than waterfall in the recent versions. It's slower than waterfall UI though.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: