I don't think that YouTube has anything against creators not using YouTube that can be funded via Patreon.
I'm pretty sure are just against it if people are using the platform and apps that they're are developing and maintaining without them having any possibility of getting any revenue in return.
It's so popular that people are uploading 500 hours of video every minute, so I assume that this platform scaling doesn't come for free and people who're working for YouTube to make this possible wants some money too.
Not much.
But I heard a lot that it is way more stable and reliable. Since they are not working on multiple providers like Vagrant does (VMWare, VBox...) every function works without a complaint. It is undeniably a great way to spin up Ubuntu VMs.
It has cloud-init too. So I don't think you'll be missing something from Vagrant.
I found this url in Google when I searched for appspot "gweb" - I used the gweb keyword because I noticed some google sites use that keyword. Generally I was searching for exposed source maps in Google owned websites.
I have plans of looking into OIDC setup soon-ish, right now I don't have any specific need for it but just for learning purposes I'll be setting it up soon.
Also I'm planning to write about Ansible as well in future.
I have Podman running in one server and Docker in another, Podman was for testing something out so I created a role for that as well.
The repo is private on GitHub as of now, I would have to re-check everything once if I accidentally did not leak any secrets at some point of time when I was still learning about Ansible. So it will be sometime before I make it a public repo.
Meanwhile, if you are looking for something specific then let me know, I will try to cover that topic in depth in some blog post.
The API isn't Sentry compatible, right?
So existing Sentry libraries can't be used and every language needs to have on open Tracro client library, right?
exactly, support for other languages (at the moment support is only for NodeJS) will be added in the near future. SDKs for Go and Python are planned first, as well as support for some UI frameworks such as React or Vue
The current browser ecosystem has more or less two engines: WebKit based browsers and Firefox. We have basically WebKit monoculture. If you'd find a fundamental flaw in WebKit, you'd be able to break most browsers.
If Internet Explorer would be open source we would have the chance to get a third engine running. Browser engines aren't trivial and IE also had some good sides after all these years.
I guess if IE would become FOSS this would bring some fresh air to the ecosystem.
WebKit and Blink are two different engines. They split off 9 years ago. There’s no such thing as a WebKit monoculture. There may be a Blink monoculture depending on how much you care about mobile browsers, mobile Safari is still very popular especially in the US.
iPad Safari is close enough to desktop Safari now that it switched to the same user agent as desktop Safari. That surely helps to bump Safari’s marketshare.
Yes, but not the IE. Opera Presto! Source code even leaked after Opera switched to webkit, and some Russians tried patching new things, but legal status made unsustainable :(.
reply