Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | andruby's commentslogin

11, 13, 17 and 19 used to trip me up. And maybe 67

67 has absolutely no right to be prime. Sitting there looking all innocent.

Maybe that’s the real secret behind the 6-7 meme going around

Unfortunately hardware can’t exist anymore without software. Everything non-trivial needs firmware or microcode.

And depending on others to write firmware for your hardware, I don’t think that’s a recipe for success.


Software team at AMD to hardware team at AMD: "Give us the hardware with the docs then we will write software for it"

Hardware team at AMD: "Sorry, hardware can't exist without software; we'll first have to write the software"

Software team: "But we're the software team ..."

Hardware team: "Uhm yeah ... seems we have a nasty chicken and egg problem here"


nitpick but Yanis Varoufakis was born in 1961 and TF2 was released in 2007 so he definitely existed first.

I do agree that he didn't create the dota/cs economy


* 2007-2010 3 years at McKinsey

* 2009-2017 8 years in US Navy, including deployment to Afghanistan

Not that much McKinsey imo

Mitt Romney had a lot more years at BCG (22 years), including being VP + co-founder of Bain Capital.


Failing to elect Romney was arguably a big mistake. Imagine what the GOP would look like today in that world.


I do agree with that. He seems so reasonable and intelligent, especially in today's world.

Why would that bankrupt them? Because there is scale reduction in total generated power?


I think that's mostly true above a certain threshold, but where that threshold lies, is probably different for different people.

The <1$ earphones you get on an airplane sound terrible. I can understand what the actors in movies are saying but that's about it. I can't hear or experience the music.

The $20 headphones my kids have are a good step up. For me headphones/speakers in the $100 range make me _feel_ more when listening to music. But I don't need to go more expensive. That's where my threshold is for music.


I understand what you're saying, but I still think it's wrong to blame the people "not wanting it". The corporations and politicians are really powerful and they go far and wide to protect their profits and interests.

Yes, the people could care more and could stand up for it, but it's so easy to blame them and that's exactly what the corporations & politicians want.


Maybe in some magical AGI future computers can do the work, but until then where else is the effort going to come from? It isn't going to randomly appear out of thin air, that is for sure. There is nothing else to "blame" but them.

It's not the "corporations"[1] keeping you from that six pack, nor it is it keeping you from building a single payer healthcare system. Not wanting to put in the toil to make it happen will certainly get in the way, though. We all understand why nobody really wants to put in the hard work and suffering to make the necessary changes, but that doesn't change the fact that it won't happen until you do it.

[1] Which, in this context, is just another way to say people. And in this case often the very same people. ~40% of US corporate stock is held by Average Joe retirements savings account (IRA, 401k, etc.). Ask these people if they'd like a single payer healthcare system and the answer would almost certainly be "Yes!". But if you then ask them to do the work to see it through: "Never mind. What we have will do.".


I can get a six pack by doing exercises in my house everyday with some weights and resistance bands for 20 minutes a day and by spending 5 minutes a day tracking my food for a year. I don't think that there is a place I can go to make single payer health care happen, even if I spent 40 hours a week for a decade at a 60% pay cut.


> I don't think that there is a place I can go to make single payer health care happen

Being generous in assuming you mean while remaining in the USA: The Amish are quite prevalent in Pennsylvania, Ohio, and Indiana. They've already done the hard work. Joining them may take some small amount of personal sacrifice, perhaps — there is no such thing as a free lunch — but is quite doable for someone who wants it. Like the six pack, all you have to do is jump in and do it.

Alternatively, you can produce your own metaphorical weights and food supply that is to your exact liking, but that is obviously going to take singificantly more input for you to setup and is going to be heavily dependent on other people to buy into your exacting specifications. This route would not allow you to just jump into building the metaphorical six pack at your leisure. It could take many years before you are even able to first produce weights/food, let alone starting to apply them to your six pack journey. But the best time to plant a tree was 20 years ago, as they say. It will never happen if you don't do anything, that much is certain.


Move to the UK


> "Corporations," in this context, is just another way to say people.

No, I think its referring more to the systems that describe how the group of people behave. It is an important distinction.

Also, the idea that effective and lasting change requires significant personal sacrifice and enduring hardship is yet another thing that corporations and politicians would like you to believe. It's great for causing inaction through human nature. Its effectiveness can be seen in anti-riot measures like tear gas or less-certainly-lethal munitions, asking people the question of "do you believe enough to endure THIS?" It's a rhetorical question.


There's been plenty of politicians trying to get single payer going, people don't vote for them. You can blame propaganda and stuff but at the end of the day people choose freely who they vote for.


I hadn't seen the news about MinIO yet.

For others that are surprised by this, it seems that there is a fork of the UI called OpenMaxIO

https://github.com/OpenMaxIO/openmaxio-object-browser


I don’t think so.

You can accept yourself and be content/happy and still want to learn new skills, try new hobbies, and grow.


I feel like all the truly transformative growth, those periods when you sprint from a nobody to the cutting edge, or start from a blank sheet and build a work of genius the likes that humanity has never seen, the manic energy that drives this, it always comes from hate. A hate for the self (wanting to prove something to yourself) or a hate for others (wanting to prove something to others), (which may really be the same thing; you're trying to invalidate your self-criticism and the perceived criticism of others by proving that you're better at something than most anyone else in the world). Mentally healthy people become mailmen.


What you describe as "hate" can work much more efficient when coming from a somewhat loving competitiveness, I think.


Exactly. When people talk of "hatred" in such context, the nature of the feeling they describe has very little in common with the kind of feelings I've had at some points. If you think you're worth growing, and improving, and rebuilding, isn't "hate" way too strong of a word?


There's a bit of both. There' s a part of you that believes in yourself and wants to prove it, that's why you're even trying. But there's another part (or something external) that doubts your abilities. The "hatred" is from that part that believes you're capable to the part that believes you're incapable.

I think the better word here is contempt.

Bit of a corollary but I've just never been motivated by love. E.g. I don't feel driven to perform well because I love my teammates or love my company or love the world and want to do good by them. It's always a hatred-contempt of wanting to prove someone wrong or to prove that everyone else has been doing it wrong (whether on a team level or a world level). That's actually why I stopped being too chummy with my direct teammates. If you like someone too much, you lose the desire to brutally outshine them. Some part of you pulls you toward the group average so as not to become ostracized.

I don't think that a genuine love for humanity will give you the energy to do good for humanity. It must come from hatred-contempt, there is no other way. "Let me show you fucking animals...". It will never come from "I love you all so much let me build this for you."


I love this insight, but mailman might not be the best example if you recall the origins of the phrase, “going postal.”


1000% correct. the second you look in the mirror and you're happy with what you see, baby, you just lost the battle.


You lost the battle of ambition, maybe, but I'd say you've won the battle of happiness.


Rails 1 to 2 was a big one indeed. Rails 2 introduced restful routes iirc, which meant refactoring a lot of fat controllers.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: