Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | andrelaszlo's comments login

Accidentally Turing complete?

"The woman was still alive while he was dying"

If I ever die, I hope it's after I'm long gone...


https://youtu.be/5DqJwmzG6Fk?si=5oUEH0YiwZFCaYO0

Well, almost without a trace. Unfortunately?


I solder very rarely and quite badly, but switching to non-lead solder just made it impossible to get good joints. I had to get a better iron, nothing fancy but with higher effect, meaning I can get to a higher temperature faster without turning the whole PCB into mush.


If I understood the article correctly it caused problems when the same file was imported multiple times, or when another file with the same base name was imported.

https://gist.github.com/bssrdf/397900607028bffd0f8d223a7acdc...


Yes, TFA says the issue is because "12345" sorts before "9888"

My solution avoids that.


Seems preferable to having to explain you're not a paramilitary organization responsible for unspeakable war crimes. Nothing funny about that.


I thought so too, the writing style has the tone, sentence structure, and word choice of an LLM.

Some examples that stood out to me:

"This allowed me to appreciate the nuances of the match and gain deeper insights into the strategies employed by both players."

"These reflections led me to analyze the match from an empirical and synthesized standpoint, aiming to form a cohesive picture of it as a whole."

I ran it through GPTZero: "We are highly confident this text was ai generated: 100% Probability AI generated"

The same goes for the author's comments and replies: https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=maximamel

This is what I would write if I was doing an LLM impression: "Thank you, you're right, I corrected this mistake."


Yeah especially the "rather than a replacement for more traditional forms of analysis" in one of his comments here tipped me off.


also , " Let me know your thoughts! "


https://lodev.org/cgtutor/examples.html#screen

They're set by screen, exactly!


Werewolf hunter? Sorority nurse? Doctor specializing in Cushing syndrome?


Speed is just one dimension of intelligence, no?

Who's more intelligent, person A that would score 80% on a test given 30 minutes, and 85% given 60 minutes; or person B that would score 50% given 30 minutes, but 99% given 60 minutes?

Person A might be perceived as quick, have an accurate intuition, and able to come up with a lot of ideas. Person B on the other hand is of the slow and steady kind that will methodically and tirelessly work on a problem until it's solved.


I think this is getting close to the idea of liquid intelligence and crystallized intelligence. The scary thing about valuing the liquid kind is that it’s the one that shrinks with age. Crystallized intelligence grows with age.


Working memory size, processing speed, fluid intelligence (novel problem solving / creativity), and crystallized intelligence (knowledge), are are all different components of intelligence that are pairwise not perfectly correlated.

Some person A can solve problem X in 1 minute and problem Y in 1 hour, while some person B can solve both in 10 minutes, even with the same crystalized intelligence.


Or person C, who knows when to rely on A's speed or B's depth.


Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: