I cannot see any major use case apart from code generation and autocompletion. Maybe summarizing text and learning new things but that can be achieved by any search engine.
A good search engine could probably take over llm.
Then I write it myself or tell it to correct itself. They tend to be confidently incorrect in many cases, but especially with the online ones you can tell them that "this bit is bullshit" and they'll try again with a different lib.
Works for common stuff, not so much for highly specialised things. An LLM can't know something it hasn't been "taught".
I love how all these European politicians wants US to send more money and weapons to Ukraine while thier own individual contributions are significantly lower.
If they want to fight so bad, why not spend more % of their own gdp, especially French and Germany who are close to the situation.
> Germany's Merz seems to know whats going on, but is still trying to be veeeery diplomatic about it.
They literally have no other option. If they could continue war on thier own, they won't be "trying to be veeeery diplomatic about it"
The reality is there can't be guarantees only temporary peace. If the deal fails, Russia won't attack mineral deposits owned by US. US would probably send troops to "protect" US resources.
The US has legal reasons now. Ukraine is a sovereign country and would be more than happy to accept US military bases. The US hasn't sent soldiers because they don't want to go to war with Russia
Why would US get involved now when they have nothing to gain and possibly escalate the situation to WW3?
If US owned resources in Ukraine, they have very good reason to deploy troops over there. Russia won't escalate the situation by attacking american resources and troop. This should slow down the war to a good extent combined with the cease fire agreements.
Your logic doesn't make sense. Why would Russia be willing to escalate to ww3 in the first scenario but back down in the second scenario?
And if getting involved will escalate to ww3, what difference does those resource deals make? Either american involvement (via NATO or this mineral deal logic) forces Russia to back down or it doesn't.
US signed memorandum of security for Ukraine. Not involving into Ukraine war means:
1. Nuke is the only option to guarantee security. Everyone should get one. Iran, Venezuela etc.
2. If you have nukes you can occupy neighbors with little/no punishment. Taiwan is the next in line.
3. US is not an ally, could not be trusted in any way.
Sad to see how Trump is dismantling USA from it's role as a global superpower.
1. Nuke doesn't guarantee anything in current situation. Russia might blow up the nuke moment it arrives in Ukr.
2. US France UK has made it very clear that they can occupy and establish military bases in non nuclear countries without repercussions, especially in Middle East and Africa.
3. Memorandum was signed by multiple nuclear countries and none of thier troops are deployed in Ukraine. Besides US was the largest supplier of weapons in Ukraine.
US is hardly affected by Ukr situation. For them to get involved, there should be something at stake. If they owned something in Ukr, they would have reason to defend it with US troops. Russia won't escalate by attacking US troops or resources.
> Ask yourself: how many problems has rust caused you in the last year?
Isn't rust flag disabled by default? How would one know if there are any problems if most people don't use it?
Besides Hellwig's concerns were legit. When rust becomes a part of kernel either maintainer would have to learn Rust or depend on rust Developers for any breaking changes in C api, assuming there would be someone interested in maintaining rust part of things.
EU funds are contributed by more than 27 countries, none of whose individual contribution comes close to what US has contributed.
According to official gov website of EU and US
* EU has allocated $145b + $50b[1]
* US has allocated $174b [2]
$500b is too much but considering how Ukraine has been losing valuable resources to Russia, it's only fair to ask for some security. According to your article, this was the "Victory Plan" all along and Zelensky agreed to it.
> Linus is saying: If you're not doing it, then you don't get to have opinions.
But eventually he would have to, if those rust interfaces becomes part of kernel. The entire drama is about DMA guys not wanting to deal with this in future.
A good search engine could probably take over llm.
reply