Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | amunozo's comments login

Yes, the paper says that is only English.

It's time to stop the "All You Need" titles. This one does not even sound good .

Need to write an article `All you need should consider harmful` .

"Considered harmful articles are all you need"

Goto is all you need.

It's one of the most irritating snowclones because most of the time the papers are not presenting some dramatic leap forward like attention.

And places with these systems are those that achieved the best quality of life and peace.

An apartment like that could cost 1500€ today. Also, flights are also more expensive.


I've been using Copilot in VSCode as I have it free as a student. I wanted to try Cursor, but money is tight. Are they that much different? If so, what makes Cursor so special?


I thought about that too! In the end, I'll probably do them both anyway.


What about consumer applications where privacy is not that much needed? What I mean is if there is any demmand for a traditional, pay-once software.


I don't think it's worth it for personal use, and the reason is simple. There are already a lot of tools that can write local LLMs, so I don't think I'd be able to get users to pay for just using the model, I'd have to provide functionality, like automating certain behaviors.


The only way I'd consider using any AI-involved system is if it's all local. SaaS is a dealbreaker for me on this.

I don't think that helps you, though, since (like most of the people on HN) I am not representative of the general public.


Your webpage is gorgeous, congrats!


Exposing students to other subjects is what make them discover what they like. I think the optimal balance would be studying a wide number of subjects, but being able to select for an even larger set.


It's a knowledge distillation. You can then use this smaller, more efficient models instead of the larger one.


Or maybe it is just memorizing a very large number of games.


They address the possibility of memorization in the PDF:

> This effect cannot be explained by memorization since < 1.41% of the initial puzzle board states appear in our training set.


Seems more like a 'compression' of the large number of games, or even like an approximate 'index' of the database


Is this network smaller than stockfish and by what metric is that?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: