to be fair, I'm actually too stupid to vacuum a carpet vs floor without it auto adjusting fo me, so just to play devil's advocate, my vacuum has worked wonders on sucking up the ight amount of floor baddies. I can also forgive the glass stuck on the floor on thanksgiving night because of all the help it's been 364 days of the year.
edit: oh yeah my letterr "R" key is broken on my 2015 macbook po fom all my refreshing, so sorry fo the typos
So mush for freedom... I can't learn the law myself? What if I'm already lawyer completely capable of skipping this fee obstacle. Who is anyone to rate the capabilities of an individual?
Wouldn't it be a better, more free, system to just make it law to issue strong warnings suggesting up to $20,000 in legal fees for the inexperienced noobies upon any share issuance.
> Wouldn't it be a better, more free, system to just make it law to issue strong warnings suggesting up to $20,000 in legal fees for the inexperienced noobies upon any share issuance
These clauses are already commonplace. People don’t read them. They then turn their losses into a political problem that breeds feel-good laws mandating red tape for everyone. Best case. Worst case: a crisis of confidence in our markets and an ensuing depression.
Better law might be a cap on this asset class as a percent of one’s investable assets?
perhaps you should watch the video and read the article. It literally states several times it has nothing to do with the advancement in the manufacturing of the type of diamonds people wear as jewelry, but, rather the type used in industry for cutting.
While you are correct, there is no need to be snarky. One of the guidelines states that:
> Please don't comment on whether someone read an article. "Did you even read the article? It mentions that" can be shortened to "The article mentions that."
what's the use case? certainly the performance impact will suffer at scale, so what's the usable limit before disadvantages outweigh the advantages of being able to use git?
I don't know about performance benchmarks to other DBs or scale, but I ran read and write benchmarks and saw 1000s op/s and felt satisfied enough. It won't be faster than filesystem unless you mount the DB directory to a RAM disk.
For my use case, speed was not the most important, instead it was using common tools on the DB, being human-readable, in JSON and git diff-able. Also, I wanted small resource usage and small library size.
I personally feel like the performance of DBs for smaller projects is a bit of a stale topic.
With SSDs at 2GBps and over, that’s on par with early server RAM and there were companies who were able to serve pretty significant loads with 2GBps RAM.
Walking around California there are literally prop 65 warnings everywhere. Some stupidly high percent of products I buy come with a prop 65 warning. It sure feels like everything causes cancer, at least in the state of California. The warnings have lost all meaning and I don’t even live in California. It just makes California look paranoid and stupid.
Would just like to point out, Putin was on record in an interview talking about Snowden, and was pretty open about how these programs make sense from an intelligence point of view, and pretty much said that Russia is doing the same thing. He wasn't pretending like they're not doing the exact same thing. I believe it's somewhat of a don't hate the player, hate the game from the perspective of the CIA/KGB/what have you.
Why can't we just be open about our smart TVs listening to us?
That's one difference about Russian and American citizens -- the Russians have pretty much accepted this, and reserve all anti government talk to private conversations or avoid it altogether, while Americans are generally in denial or just ignorant about it.
The "nothing to hide" argument mistakenly suggests that privacy is something only criminals desire. Fences and curtains are ways to ensure a measure of privacy, not indicators of criminal behavior. Privacy is a fundamental part of a dignified life.
He has the image of a dictator (rightly so) and doesn't need to hide it. He connects the image western people have of him to their own domestic actors. If he just condemned it, he would be the hypocrite. So he opted to redirect animosity towards him to others.
Pointing out mass surveillance isn't an attack on the integrity of the US, it is an attack on the practice you would expect from Putin.
edit: oh yeah my letterr "R" key is broken on my 2015 macbook po fom all my refreshing, so sorry fo the typos