no it means if a space is extremely competitive u shouldnt compete in it. eg, opening up a restaurant in a city. unlikely to succeed even if u do its unlikely to be extraordinary.
I think what he's referring to is the notion that all companies want monopolies. Peter Thiel talks a lot about this. So if you can't have a monopoly, and you're in a business where everyone is lowering the prices etc, it's not ideal.
I think "winning" here refers to success in money, power, etc. However society generally defines it!
In my humble opinion, it doesn't matter if you're in the game for long if you don't even matter.
Alrigth but the tldr is that he's looking for markets where domination is a possibility, so that's my takeaway anyways! :)
I want to point out you dodged the data question, and there's a reason for it.
I like your work visually on first glance, god knows you're right about gradio, even if its irrelevant.
But peddling extremely limited, out of date, versions of other people's data, trumps that, especially with this tagline. "A website to compare every AI model: LLMs, TTSs, STTs"
It is a handful of LLMs, then one TTS model, then one STT model, both with 0 data. And it's worth pointing out, since this endeavor is motivated by design trumping all: all the columns are for LLM data.
reply