Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | agilescale's commentslogin

Quality trolling. A++, would read again.


Being serious for a moment, quality documentation is an area where many lisps could use improvement.


Yes, I've seen it Clojure, where the documentation is extensive, giving great coverage to its standard library... but still haves you reading the source and searching the web for examples after reading the description, especially when speaking about macros (so... does this receive a vector? Does it take its arguments as a list, or what? A mixture of both?)

Racket goes full in the other direction, to a fault, even though it's much preferable.Racket's documentation is at times hard to wade through because it's so extensive. You have to scroll through the treatises and descriptions of options to find an example usage which will get you out quickly, but it's, for once, all there in the manual.


Haha, I actually really like how Racket does it and consider them a great example to follow:

- Racket's documentation is all on your local machine. Stuck without an Internet connection? F1, and you're searching your own documnetation index.

- Everything -- everything -- is hypelinked. If you see a blue word in a code example, even the ones on the front page of http://racket-lang.org/ , you can click on it and jump straight to that function's contract.

But I agree, I wish there were a better way to jump straight to examples when you're looking at a specific function's documentation. It's confusing having the completely separate "Guide" and "Reference" halves of the documentation with no links between them.


My gripe with Racket's documentation is that there is no middle ground between tutorials designed to showcase features rather than explain how Racket does and doesn't work and computer generated auto-docs. The tutorials are more geared toward selling the language to beginners, while the rest of the documentation is bereft of illustrative examples and editorial discussion.


Surely you mean (++ A)?


    (1+ 'A)


Symbol A is not of type number.

(1+ a)


A++ is a grade, not a number. Clearly what you need is #S(grade :letter A :decorations (+ +) :rapidly-escalating-pedantry t) or some other meaningful representation.


I can see why the lady at the bottom right was rolling her eyes.


So if everybody eats potatoes and bread all day... that's enough for you because it satisfies an incredibly obtuse quantitative metric?


If someone gets fat off potatoes and bread they are consuming too much. They could reduce consumption of potatoes/bread and spend the money they save on vegetables.


This whole discussion is an example of why reductionism should be handled with care.

Have you considered how easy it is to stuff yourself with simple carbohydrates? Do you


Fat people have lots of fat. Muscle and bone amd cardiovascula health and brain mylenation are another matter.


It must be because:

a. Somebody bothered to post the initial announcement of this guy

b. He describes his process in detail

c. He's a Software Engineer; it would be disingenuous to think that the fact that he's a peer for the members of this audience isn't a factor


I don't think that fascism means what you think it means. The fascists I have argued with, and this does follow some excerpts from Mussolini's works and speeches, are subjectivists.

And yes, they do exist. They are actually a pest in certain forums. 4chan has a board which functions essentially as a ghetto for them and other miscellaneous right wingers, so that they won't be screwing up, say, the science or the sports boards with white supremacist spiel.


Would you mind parroting out the reasons for dismissal of those ``fallacious'' complaints?


deflation - Hayeks

volatility - infancy


That's about as silly as pointing to the Bible when somebody asks for evidence of Jesus.



``Reddit'' is worthy of bashing in many ways, but you are bashing it for the wrong reasons; the reason why the article was downvoted there most surely wasn't because of the lack of image macros, but rather that it ran against the locals (he probably posted it in a pro-Bitcoin subreddit) religious fervor.

You still see them swearing allegiance to Bitcoin and deriding those who sold during the crash, all the while holding on to their, at least temporarily, worthless Bitcoins.


They are pretty.


The fact that this wasn't about the latest Javascript light framework didn't tip you off?


As a non-gym goer (if I had the money...), what injuries are you talking about? I can guess that gyms want to protect people who try to lift more weight than they can, rather than straining from posture.


> As a non-gym goer (if I had the money...), what injuries are you talking about?

The problem with Smith Machines is that the movements are all linear, e.g. perfectly straight. NOTHING in your body moves in a perfectly straight line, there is an arc to almost everything you do.

Frequently people do squats with smith machines which will eventually hurt their backs from bad form.

(Indeed, I wince in pain sometimes watching people do horrible things to their backs in smith machines, holy crap!)

Now you CAN do things wrong with barbells of course, but many of the things done with a smith machine cannot be right at all!

> (if I had the money...),

My small local gym costs $200 a year.

Find a small local neighborhood gym (even if it isn't in your neighborhood!), they are always affordable!

And hey, body weight exercise programs are free. :)


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: