Fair question. Those three are hosting services for stock OpenClaw — you sign up, they spin up an instance, you get a Telegram bot. That's it.
We built something different.
Every agent gets a real Chromium browser running on a virtual display. You can watch it work through a VNC viewer right in the dashboard. None of those services have this — they're text-in/text-out.
Each workspace runs up to 10 agents, each with its own browser and filesystem. Agents can spawn sub-agents to break up complex tasks. Every workspace is an isolated Docker container with dropped capabilities and security policies, not a shared Node process.
Those services give you a chatbot you talk to on Telegram. We give you an agent with a browser, a shell, a scheduler, and the ability to actually do things on the internet — and you can watch it do them.
I keep discovering infinite OpenClaw deployment solutions whether that be Claw for all, SimpleClaw, or Clawi etc to name some. Most of them look like they were vibe coded in 1 hour and I wonder how many of them actually work and don't have major bugs.
Some of these tools are also claiming massive numbers of users and MRR but I am skeptical and wonder if it is just AI inflated hype on X.
Most of the chatgpt wrappers are now dead and I wonder if OpenClaw wrappers share the same fate.
Have any of you used them and if you did: how was your experience, what went wrong, what should people be worried about and are they just hype or will they actually be the future of people launching personal agents?
simpleclaw.com clawi.ai clawforall.app
what makes this one any different
reply