If you're a $100B+ entity, you let your lawyers do the talking in filings. By hosting this on their own blog, OpenAI is essentially admitting that they care more about the 'court of public opinion' than the actual court case. It feels less like a tech giant and more like a messy startup feud that hasn't grown up yet
Both sides here are $100B+ entities! But neither one is acting like it. The plaintiff is shitposting on Twitter, and the respondent is counter-shitposting on their blog (and also Twitter).