How reliably do agents stick to the 'coast exec' boundary in practice? Especially when they spawn subagents that may or may not inherit the instructions.
Actually pretty reliably but you do need to explicitly call out the skill. I usually start agent threads with /coasts or in codex $coasts. Once it’s in the conversation they stick to it though.
One cool thing we do is we have the docs and semantic search of our docs baked into the CLI, so if the agents get lost they can usually figure things out kind of quickly by searching the docs via the cli.
Also we have a little section our agent.md and claude.md,I’m not sure how well it works without that.
So the graph is human-maintained, and agents consume it and `lat check` is supposed to catch broken links and code-spec drift. How do you manage this in a multi-agent setup? Is it still a manual merge+fix conflicts situation? That's where I keep seeing the biggest issues with multi-agent setups
Curious if you've seen a difference between agents finding things through the graph structure vs just vector search over a docs directory. The section constraints and check validation seem like the real quality wins here, wondering how much the wiki link topology adds on top of that.
reply