Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | __float's commentslogin

While I don’t think the new meaning is incredibly widespread yet, it’s not uncommon for words to change meaning over time. I wouldn’t be surprised if a decade or two from now, the original meaning has been mostly forgotten.

Err, what do you mean they cannot do anything? Where are you meeting these programmers??

Large (non software) enterprises. Mostly. Government departments. That type of thing. Like I said in another thread; have a wander with me over to Shell, Barclays and stuff like that; entire bags of (many outsourcing/external) 'programmers' who don't know how variables or loops work.

I mean, two of them are cloud vendors. The rest just seem like very boring components of a (somewhat) modern data pipeline.


The issue isn't the vendors themselves necessarily but the quantity of them. Plenty of boring things over the years have had security vulnerabilities that end up with data getting leaked, so each additional one is just more risk even if you trust them not to be actively malicious. All it takes is one well-meaning but careless vendor to make the whole house of cards collapse.


What are the common terms for those? (I have heard "devbox" across multiple companies, and I'm not in the LLM world enough to know the other parts.)


I've worked for years at companies that only use Google Sheets.

For 99% of people (sometimes we let Finance folks have an Excel license), it's more than enough. Google Apps Script is also reasonably useful, and the newer Smart Chips are a nice addition.


It's not, because it's a conspiracy theory. They'll make tenuous connections between unrelated things and extrapolate some grand scheme to match their fiction.



Sometimes political views should actually get you shunned.

You're always free to create a fork.


And this is why it needs a reason/ban rule. You guys simply can’t help yourselves.


Please tell us the correct political views we should have, or at least provide a list of the political views that will result in a shunning.


You know exactly the ones they're talking about.

The ones you're not willing to say with your whole chest in public because you know what everyone will think about you.

Either have the courage of your own convictions or have shame, you pick.


The (paid!) iOS client has always been a disappointment to me, and I've long been jealous of the open source Android one.

I don't mind so much that it's paid, given how much use I get for the price, but it sucks knowing it sucks and not being able to help make it better.


I've just bought it to support the developer, as it was according to his website his preferred way to support him.


Agreed. I’m particularly excited that they’ll be investing in the UI/UX.


I use the iOS app daily, and while it's not the prettiest thing in the world, it has nearly every feature of the desktop client, including full scripting support for card contents, which is amazing for things like collapsable elements and media. And, at the end of the day, it's about what you learn from using it that matters.


That's part of my problem. I actually don't love how many billion options Anki has, and I'd love something with a more opinionated UI.

(I think the data model underneath Anki is...showing its age (and lack of explicit design) and building that on top of it would not be too easy. I've thought about it a few times.)


Is it still 25$ price? Makes it impossible to recommend Anki to friends/students to "try spaced repetition".


Just have them use it on their computer or the web?

It improved my grades so much in college that I spent the 25 bucks as a broke student so I could have it on my second hand iPad. This was before AnkiDroid even existed so it's amazing the price is still the same.


That works for people who already convinced that they want to use it. I'm talking about people who've heard it for the first time and they're not going to spend 25$ for some new app just to try. 25$ is unusually high price for an AppStore app and it's just doesn't work unless you're really determined to use it. I don't understand why people are downvoting this.


I would argue that it's almost impossible to start first with the mobile version so this situation should never happen. The computer version is essential for setting up and getting decks. The web version remains free as well.


Why would it be the case?

Anki app has an interface for adding/editing cards, and can absolutely be used without AnkiWeb or syncing. In fact, this is how I used it myself for years. I would argue that using AnkiWeb and syncing is an advanced feature for people who got the taste of having own decks and don't want to loose it.


They can just use the computer version then, and buy it when they know it's useful for them?


Some people would need to buy computer first. Again, it's very hard to recommend mobile app to people if you need to add these kind of "workarounds". Especially for the main target audience - young students – many of whom live in their mobile phones and not used to spend 25$ for apps.


Every university student in the Western world has access to a Computer, and those who are poor usually have an Android Phone (with free AnkiDroid) and not a very expensive iPhone. If they can afford an iPhone they can afford the App

I think this "problem" is somewhat made up


Well, I don't want to sound patronizing, but the world is so much bigger than your notion of "Western world" where every student with iPhone has computer.


You are patronizing. Every student with an iPhone has access to a computer even if it isn't their own. If they are so poor that none of their facilities have one then they have a cheap Android.

This fictional person you describe also has access to the web and Anki on there.

Anki is not a very useful tool if you are not making or editing your own decks or a teacher is for you. This is an incredibly painful experience on mobile.


> Every student with an iPhone has access to a computer even if it isn't their own

This is simply not true.


Well I have a friend who manages his entire self written 10.000 Card collection entirely on an Samsung Tab with AnkiDroid.

I would agree with you, but he doesn't seem to mind


They can try it on desktop and web for free if they are that skeptical.


Can you imagine, a lot of young people don't have desktop/laptop, only mobile.


The web client works just fine!


"Hey, there is an amazing app for learning, but it costs 25$ for your iPhone, so just use web version instead".

Very appealing, makes people try app immediately. :)


I think you essentially have to use the desktop version no matter what—so the real dichotomy is whether you want to use a free program with free online hosting with the bundled (free) web application... or if you want to buy a $25 app.

It seems a lot like saying nobody should use GMail unless they agree to pay for premium Google Services.


I don't have this problem. I bought iOS Anki app for myself many years ago. What I found hard is to recommend it to others, who never heard about spaced repetition yet, especially to young students, who arguably is the main target audience for this kind of tools. They just not jumping into buying 25$ app to try it. As soon as you start mentioning switching to laptop, using web/desktop - they're not jumping into it either. I don't know maybe you all have different experience, but that's what I experienced over the years and it always felt sad, because this price is a prohibitively high for many people.


This is kind of a weird request, IMO.

If you're a homelab NixOS user, isn't it on you to try to answer these questions? A home lab is for learning, and if you don't want to do that, what's the point?


The second paragraph explains this: they already have paid, and some people have paid [again], but their purchase is not accepted.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: