Thank you, glad you like it. Yes, it's better when you give it some specificity, though not too much either.
If you have constraints like drive duration limits, you can also tell it that and it'll often (not always) comply, especially in "slower but smarter" mode.
It's not intended to replace a doctor, though some may take the fact that it exceeds the passing score on USMLE as enough competence, depending on their needs.
As with all bootstrapped projects that just started, there's no building, no known name, just a new honest project that works but has no way of proving it. Much like why you'd give hotmail all your private data back in the day just because it's there and you need it, despite (in my case at least) knowing absolutely nothing about what or who was behind it.
Would it help if I add a FAQ and or an About Us explaining a bit more? All the system does is extract the data from the file, use it to produce the report, and send the report. There's no further processing of any kind.
How might a new project like this get the credibility or be seen as credible enough for people to start using it and derive value from it with confidence? Very interested in your thoughts / advice.
I thought about linking to a third-party document anonymizing tool so that you can completely remove all references to you or your name or identity before uploading the results. Would that help?
Thanks for the feedback. Sometimes "Faster" mode gets confused, especially if you are requesting information from (in this case) a Spanish-speaking area. That has a fairly simple solution that will be implemented if I continue working on the project (though unfortunately it looks like there might not be enough interest to justify it), but for now, you can:
(a) use "slower but smarter" mode, or
(b) simply re-send the request (It'll often get it right the second time), or
(c) be explicit in the preferences that you want your recommendations in English
Did you find it useful? Sort of useful but not really enough to actually use it?
Most of the recc's it gave me for NYC I already knew about. But I did learn of some live music that happens out in Propsect Park and I think I'll be checking it out tomorrow. Would definitely use again
Glad it helped. It probably won't teach locals much, but if you go elsewhere and don't have a friend there to explain, it probably works.
You may want to be even more specific about what you want in the preferences and sometimes that can make it go deeper, but in the end it knows what it knows.
You may also want to try "slower but smarter" mode. But yes, it'll help more in a place you don't already know.
I made a tool to read and write the facts on each public controversy, with liked evidence and in a hierarchy of upvotes and objections.
The aim is to have a place where, in one or two minutes, one can read the main facts on any controversy, instead of having to plough through 10+ hours of material where the factual gems are often hidden. Towards bullshit-free utterance.
The link points to the topic on Coronavirus.
Anyone can add new controversies, add and upvote facts, add objections, and upvote objections. A bit of a Reddit (decentralised hierarchy) / Wikipedia (factual) / Twitter (brevity) cross.
Email login is a bit buggy though works. Google login is faster.
If you have constraints like drive duration limits, you can also tell it that and it'll often (not always) comply, especially in "slower but smarter" mode.
Yes, GPT is the main tool back there.