Not exactly, this assumption is subject to selection/survivorship bias. In the long run, it looks like it's the other way around. 30 years from now will we still be coding in Python/Javascript? I have much respect for the older cs graduates that did Pascal, Oberon, Lex, Yacc, Flex, and Bison, but do most employers pay any regard to their past education or experience?
I think what matters most is learning to be flexible and adaptable. You got to plan for a career or constantly learn and challenge yourself.
Who knows what the future will bring?
Maybe one day construction sites will use kanban or scrum...
Maybe one day construction projects will require architects, engineers, scrum masters...
1. Porridge with a banana and a dash of cinnamon.
2. Whole-grain brown bread with peanut butter or whole-grain brown bread with a poached egg.
3. Juice from two freshly squeezed oranges.
4. Green tea.
5. Greek yogurt with a nut and seed mix.
6. Vitamin and mineral supplement every second day.
There's an article that goes into motivation versus discipline [1] that holds a similar view to what you're saying - motivation is like waiting to get into Olympic form, whereas discipline is what gets you to Olympic form.
It's because the programmers aren't involed in the science being undertaken. They're put in a position where they are just programming for programming's sake
The Trending Team seem to be treated as if they are a tool of the engineers. A very good piece of software that the engineering can make use of and integrate into their systems. They mustn't forget that they are actually people!
First, ensure that schools have enthusiastic and supportive teachers that are willing to stay back after school to work with kids on their science projects.
Second, remove the barrier to entry. That is, get rid of assessment and acceptance into science fairs being based on verbose entry forms. Have preliminary rounds where all students get the joy and buzz of representing at a science fair.
In Ireland the traditional science fair has been the BT Young Scientist Exhibition. This competition garners the most money and media attention. Every year thousands of applications are submitted. These applications are quickly narrowed down to approximately five hundred which are allowed to represent at the fair. The way I see it, every year this fair is losing more future scientists and technologists than it is creating. What kid will be interested in following and pursuing science after they're discouraged by a rejected application form?
A new science fair in Ireland that we now have is SciFest. This competition is in a much more encouraging format. All students no matter what project they have get the opportunity to present their projects to judges in preliminary rounds before the winners are brought through to the next round. This is a much more inclusive format.
