Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | SilverSlash's comments login

TIL

Can you come up with better names?


GPT-2, GPT-3, GPT-4.

Google AI. Google AI 2. Google AI 3. - for google

AIPal. AltmanAI. PayAI. - for Altman


If you go through the linked discussion on google groups you'll find Guido van Rossum advocating for using python :P


How about: Deprecation for C++26?


Let me guess, it only run on an IBN 5100?


Only for the optional "read time travel and world domination plans" module.



Except your single experience doesn't mean it's generally true, bud. For instance I have not switched to Opus despite claims that it is better because I don't want to go through the effort of cancelling my ChatGPT subscription and subbing to Claude. Plus I like getting new stuff early that OpenAI occasionally gives out and the same could apply for Google's AI.


I first heard about Cyc's creator Douglas Lenat a few months back when I watched an old talk by Richard Feynman.

https://youtu.be/ipRvjS7q1DI?si=fEU1zd6u79Oe4SgH&t=675



My biggest question is: If Sam Altman starts a new company by next month, and him and Greg Brockman know all details of how GPT4/5 works, then what what will this mean for OpenAI's dominance and lead?


Wasn’t he more of a business guy while Ilya was the engineer? I really doubt a random VC guy is going to really know much about the specific, crucial details the engineering team knows.


You know, I'm sure Sam Altman is a really smart guy for real.

But to be honest the impression I've gathered is that he's largely a darling to big ycombinator names which lead him quite rapidly dick first into the position he's found himself in today, which is a self proclaimed prepper who starts new crypto coins post-dogecoin even, talking about how AI that aren't his AI should be regulated by the government, and making vague analogies about his AI being "in the sky" while he takes a formerly announced to be non-profit goal into a for-profit LLC that overtly reminds everyone at every turn how it takes no liability, do not sue.

I'm not really sure to be surprised, or entirely unsurprised.

I mean, he probably knows more code than Steve Jobs? But I suppose GPT probably knows more code than he does. Maybe he really is using the GeniePT as his guide throughout life on the side.


I’m sure he’s not a dumb guy, just disposable relative to OpenAI’s engineering team. I doubt he’s a Jobs-like, indispensable visionary, either.


Apparently Sam's idol growing up was Steve Jobs so this checks out.


Even if sama and gdb raised $10B by early 2024, all of the GPU production capacity is already allocated years out. They'd have to buy some other company's GPUs at insane markups. And that's only on the hardware side.


Jensen/CoreWeave/Lambda/etc will ensure sama gets what he needs.


Yeah, and then they will do what? Type the model learning data by memory? Run stolen python scripts? How exactly this hardware supposed to be used?


What do you think Brockman did as co-founder of OpenAI, exactly?


Things have changed a lot. Companies have locked down their data a lot in the last year. E.g. reddit, twitter

Even if things hadn't changed, OpenAI has been building their training set for years. It is not something they can just whip up overnight.


Jensen will take Sam's calls in a heartbeat and personally ensure he has what he needs.


He can't. That capacity is sold. He is not going to get his company sued for a breach of contract for a personal favor.


As will Lisa Su. This is going to be quite a ride.


Exactly. Entire city blocks will be cleared for Sam. Anything he needs. Just give him a road.


Pure hero worship based on nothing. Dude got himself fired and the board accused him of lying.


I agree however he'll have no problem finding another vehicle.


I don't think that specific knowledge means that much. The landscape is changing in a crazily fast pace. 3~4 years ago, Google was way ahead in terms of LLM but has become an underdog after bleeding talents thereafter. It's even worse for that hypothetical new company. It needs at least several months to implement GPT-4 like models and by that time Sam will lose most of his advantages at that moment. And we don't know whether the new company will have enough pool of world class talents to push the technology competitive. To win the competition again, Sam would need more than just some internal knowledge about GPT-4 or whatever models.


> If Sam Altman starts a new company by next month, and him and Greg Brockman know all details of how GPT4/5 works, then what what will this mean for OpenAI's dominance and lead?

Well, if two top level officers dismissed from top posts at OpenAI go and take OpenAI's confidential internal product information and use it to try and start a new, directly competing, company, it means that OpenAI's lawyers are going to be busy, and the appropriate US Attorney's office might not be too far behind.


I think Sam and Greg could build something similar to what ChatGPT is today, and maybe even get close to GPT-4, but going beyond that seems like a stretch. Ilya is really the one that’s needed, and clearly he does not see eye to eye with Sam. Another world-class AI researcher at the level of Ilya would have to step in, and I’m not even sure that person exists.


I think Karpathy could qualify


In other words, if SamA did it once, would $50 billion in funding enable him do it a 2nd time?


He's not going to get $50 billion in funding


Well to be considered a genius in the ranks of Steve Jobs, you need to succeed more than once. If he can't do it a second time, then he'd be known as the guy who fails upward.


Well, to be considered a genius like Steve jobs, you eventually need to return to the company you left – or were ousted from – when it's on the precipice of defeat and then proceed to turn it around.


Or maybe he was a "manager" who took the credit


Is OpenAI's current success attributed more to its excellent business and startup management, or does it stem from its superior technology and research that surpasses what others have developed?


Both IMO.

The first leads to attractong world-class talent that can do the second. Until you go off the rails and the second kicks you out it seems.


You don't think already starting with world-class talent (Sutskever, Karpathy, Zaremba and more being part of the founding team) lead to OpenAI being able to get more world-class talent, rather than world-class talent joining because of Altman?


Yeah. I don't care who Altman is cause he ain't the technical leader from a researcher perspective.

Altman is a CEO golden boy techbros.


We all know how GPT4/5 work essentially. You can easily run a GPT capable model with a few GPUs in the cloud. The secret sauce is the training data, that openAI owns.


Not the app builder but the app store and revenue sharing, if rumors are to be believed.


That doesn't pass the smell test.

Those seems like implementation details, really strange.


Probably someone super competent at technical leadership.


Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: