Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | QuestionWriter's commentslogin

Agreed, most of the wealth generated by most businesses is enjoyed by its customers, not its owners. Take Google or Facebook - while they enjoy huge profits now, and will in the future, their profits are dwarfed by the wealth (search and connection) they have created for their users.


Do share more. I thought many of the comments were surprisingly clued-in.


Well... First of all - bitcoin is not "digital coins" or "digital gold", but p2p distributed ledger in first place.

Once you truly get it, most comments become irrelevant.


If synchronized clocks are a problem, I wonder why they don't race the neutrino against a photon. Obviously the photon would have to take a different path - maybe bouncing off a satellite.

I wonder how accurate the GPS synchronization is too. I'm wondering if it takes into account different atmospheric conditions and the index of refraction of radio waves in air.


Time measurements are interestingly difficult when you start to care about high accuracy or long times. There's a kind of hard-to-read but interesting running log on the state of the leap second at http://www.ucolick.org/~sla/leapsecs/onlinebib.html. (What, you didn't know there were leap seconds? See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leap_second)


How about two pairs atomic clocks. One paired at the start point, one paired at the end point then a start- and an end-clock being used in both locations? Or use a neutral third frame of reference by timing from a pulsar.

This probably wouldn't work, time dilation under gravity makes my head hurt!


>If synchronized clocks are a problem, I wonder why they don't race the neutrino against a photon. Obviously the photon would have to take a different path - maybe bouncing off a satellite.

how about just inside the fiber. How good is the ping between CERN and Gran Sasso ? :)


I'll bet the Flash you made 10 years ago still works, and I'll bet the JS game you made doesn't.

I'll wager the Flash you make today will still work in 10 years, and I'll wager the HTML5 won't.


Just cruising around the websites of local stores in my town, their websites that were made 5-10 years ago still look the same as ever, and for the most part still function the same as ever. (The exceptions being when they relied on third-party includes that have since gone out of business.)

HTML5 is just HTML, and unless that fundamentally changes, it should work "forever." JavaScript too, again, unless you're linking to frameworks hosted by companies that later go out of business. JavaScript usually adds, but rarely takes away.

The look of your HTML site 10 years from now may look more outdated than your Flash site does, but as long as we're all still around, I'd wager that they'd both still work, provided Flash player is still a thing.


HTML5 is just HTML, and unless that fundamentally changes, it should work "forever."

That is, if you don't use the bunch of temporary CSS properties browser vendors are supporting (-moz-, -khtml-, -ms-, -o-, etc) that people often assume to be "ready" but that will be deprecated in the future.



That's what I had experienced - the Babylon toolbar, another one in a long line of annoying crapware.

My girlfriend accidentally installed it when downloading a PDF printer or similar.

They have a search page that looks just like Google's (maybe to minimize the need to switch back).

I didn't get the Microsoft toolbar version, I guess the Babylon one was bad enough.

I used to like C-net, now it's definitely going downhill.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: