You can go all the way back to when Facebook was the dominant gaming platform to realize how much leeway there is: what actually got Vostu in trouble - privately settling that is - was copying so blatantly they "inherited" bugs from Zynga.
Yeah and no? Python Lists indeed don't make any sort of array-like guarantee, but they're implemented as a vector/autogrowing-array of python object references (but these objects are not guaranteed to be cache-local).
The implementation defines the underlying data structure as PyObject *ob_item
Maybe if you don't consider CPU architecture, but most would expect to be able to do loops over Arrays that don't incur in a lot of cache misses, and Python Lists don't do that, since they're actually arrays of pointers to heap memory.
An englishman, a scotsman and an irishman are marooned on a desert island. Afer a long year one of them finds a lamp, and when cleaning it up a genie appears.
The genie offers them one wish each
The Irishman says 'sure i'd give anything to be back in galway, stuck in a snug, with a pint of porter' and <poof> he's gone.
The scotsman is amazed and roars 'take me back tae glasgae!' and in a similar puff of smoke is gone.
The englishman, looks around and says 'I say, its going to be awfully lonely around here without those chaps around, can you bring them back please?'
Yeah, I'm not sure what the OP is talking about. There's definitely a sense of irritation at my office when you've got 4/5 people in office for a meeting and we have to dial in to talk to the 5th who is remote, especially when they could have come in.
I wouldn't really say very differently. Residential AC and Heat Pumps are available in pretty the same spec range. You can make an AC by removing/replacing some parts from a Heat pump and that's what some manufacturers do, meaning they're literally almost the same (except for the reversing valve, accumulator, outside meter and defrosting and some other small stuff)
I'm guessing you're not a lawyer, and I'm not either, so there might be some details that are not obvious about it, but the regulation draws the line at allowing you to do[1]:
> any action voluntarily taken in good faith to restrict access to or availability of material that the provider or user considers to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected
I think that allows your use case without liability.
That subsection of 230 is about protecting you from being sued for moderating, like being sued by the people who posted the content you took down.
The "my moderation makes me liable for everything I don't moderate" problem, that's what's addressed by the preceding section, the core of the law and the part that's most often at issue, which says that you can't be treated as publisher/speaker of anyone else's content.
It's not a loophole. That's the intended meaning, otherwise it would be a violation of freedom of association.
That doesn't mean anyone is free to promote content without liability, just that moderating by deleting content doesn't make it an "expressive product."
reply