That is an interesting discussion. I'd go for a small door (opaque)/large window (transparent) that one can from the inside. A large triple glazed window ON the door (a smaller door ON a bigger door), a red/yellow light switch, a elevator-like ring/bell, a walkie-talkie permanently installed inside, a staff-count every 30mins. And then I am thinking that after 2-3 weeks all the people-dependent solutions would be abandoned...
> before we get a central bank that exists for the American people and not capital that operates in America
The USA is arguably the most capitalistic country/culture/society on Earth, and you're wondering how long it will be until the USA fundamentally changes the core mechanism of its banking to be inherently socialistic?
I can't say when, but it's not happening without a violent revolution that would make 1790s France look like a children's fairy tale.
Having fewer wheels does not mean you have more traction - contrary to popular belief, a racecar can trivially out-brake a MotoGP bike despite weighing an order of magnitude more. The contact patch size matters more than the number of contact patches. This is ignoring the issue of perfectly balancing a unicycle to stop effectively, where just the time it takes to transition from leaning forward to backwards is a significant cost in time and distance for braking compared to any vehicle that has inherent lateral stability (such as a car or a motorcycle).
> I know my car only applies brakes to the front wheels.
I doubt this. What kind of car do you have? Almost all modern cars apply brakes to all 4 wheels. In most cars which have most of the weight in the front the brake bias is approximately 80% front and 20% rear. For mid-engine cars this usually shifts to 60% front and 40% rear. Some cars might be somewhere in between depending on their weight distribution. The limiting factor in braking is tires, and the way to improve that is by increasing the contact patch size - which is done by increasing tire widths, diameters, and the number of tires.
Racecars are essentially wings due to the aerodynamic plate on their underbelly, sucking themselves hard downwards into the ground, that's why they can brake better than vehicles that don't do that. And contact patch has to be the most misunderstood and overanalyzed concept in racing. It's baked into the coefficient of friction already. The force it exerts is still directly proportional to the normal force on each wheel.
>What kind of car do you have? Almost all modern cars apply brakes to all 4 wheels.
That's good if it's true. Maybe they will make 18-wheeler trucks start having brakes on all 18 wheels so they can get similar stopping distances as those cars. Point is there are plenty of vehicles on the road where only 2 or the 4 tires go into a skid when they lose traction. Parent comment was absolutist about how unicycles will "never" match any other vehicle in braking. I figured I'd defend unicycles. Don't want to jump off the rails too much here.
I know my car has rear drum brakes actuated by the hand brake. It can lock up the rear tires for a drift. And front disc brakes actuated by the foot pedal. Perhaps it does use all 4 when I press the foot pedal - my mistake if so.
I think it's funny you're objectively wrong but continue to insist you're right. Anyway, I'm not gonna waste any more time correcting someone that's allergic to learning.
Ah, knocking all the chess pieces off the board and strutting away. It's funner to actually think about the interesting problem tho. I just got back from a weekend EUC race at Alameda naval tarmac, I love pushing what the things are capable of.
You joined the comment tree of "I don't think (electric included) unicycles will ever have the same stopping performance of conventional vehicles" and have taken the position of defending that absolutist statement.
I get it, not everyone is familiar with EUC racing. To help, here is a photo of the average hard brake from 40+mph on a modern EUC (probably a ET Max or Lynx or similar high kilowatt wheel), since you might not be familiar with what we are discussing -
Notice how far you lean to decelerate from speed. Note the handle you can yank as you buck your bodyweight back. That all forces the controller to compensate with more kilowatts of stopping power, instantly righting the gyro sensor. The more you try to tip it backwards, the harder it brakes to force itself back upright.
I don't have a mythbusters style video to make it crystal clear that you're wrong, but sounds like its a good idea, by how folks are reacting to the news. I'll suggest it to my youtuber friends.
For now, try to imagine a vehicle that invalidates your position. We only need one example after all, it being an absolutist statement. Think of edge cases. Something that skids around a lot. Fixie bike in NYC? The kind you see messengers whizzing around on all the time, that can only skid their rear wheel, and have no front brake, by design. Still defending the claim?
And to your point - an F1 car with thousands of pounds of aerodynamic downforce will stop shorter than an EUC, absolutely. We agree there.
You don’t learn by talking, you learn by listening. And you’re talking too much about Japan for someone who knew nothing about the place and extrapolated that it must be like Europe.
Who would tell me anything to listen about housing in Japan if didn't say anything about it? I never ever heard about housing being more affordable in Japan than in the rest of the world until today. Now I learnt something and feel happy and grateful about this.
By the way I still doubt it's so affordable there that I myself would consider it affordable. I would after hearing the majority of people who are homeless or live with their parents saying they seriously just prefer living this way.
I consider Japan to be a great example other countries should learn from in a number of ways though.
I think it's mostly an issue of experience. Younger engineers tend to make things more complicated than they need to be and are unaware of reliability issues. Older engineers better understand tried-and-true systems and are more likely to want to stick with things they know work well.
Obviously I'm speaking generally and individuals vary greatly.
