We replicated the behavior (somewhat) of the article, using podman, as a way to allow devs to SSH into a container that was identical to the CI/CD environment.
It also mapped in their NFS home drive, so they could quickly SSH into the container to try a build, to see if it was their dev machine, or a real issue.
It did allow them to choose their container though.
If the lifetime energy savings are greater than this energy cost then it's still a good idea. You only need a thin coating so it sounds plausible to me.
I am using it on Ubuntu 20 without issue and have used it on Ubuntu 18 and 19 in the past. The reason I archived it is because I was unable to support the various Linux distros out there. I was getting support requests for distros I've never used before. Unfortunately supporting Linux software is hard :-/
> Word is out, and unfortunately true: @CSIRO's @Data61news dismantles Trustworthy Systems (TS), the team that shook the scientific world with the first correctness proof of an OS, #seL4. TS staff to reallocate to AI projects or sacked.
> TS was exemplary in @CSIRO's @Data61news: from world-leading fundamental research to real-world deployment. It had a strong culture of excellence that aimed high and shunned incremental work, #seL4 a prime example. @sel4Foundation
> Claims by @CSIRO's @Data61news of research excellence sound hollow. I challenge you to identify work in Data61 eclipsing the TS team and #seL4. Yet it's easy to identify highly incremental work in Data61 that seems safe.
> And it's not that TS rested on its laurels: Time Protection, systematic prevention of information leakage through timing channels - in the too-hard basket for most. This has just won its third Best Paper Award, at @DateConference'21.
> This would be a disaster for #seL4, had we not set up the seL4 Foundation to minimise dependency on @CSIRO's @Data61news. Please help us strengthening @seL4Foundation, to bring real #security to the world's computing systems.
> TS's work will continue @UNSW, in close collaboration with @lsf37 and colleagues at #ProofCraft and our ecosystem partners in @seL4Foundation. Together we will continue to define the state of the art in OS #security.
Yes, you're right, it is the isostatic unloading that they're referring to - but in regards to the 'sucking', they seem to mean that the semi-localised unloaded of the top of crust (via rain, river incision) creates a zone of lower lithostatic pressure, and so that area ends up getting pushed up to maintain isostatic equilibrium. Not truly a 'sucking', but as an analogy, I think it's OK.
It's more easily seen as part of the critical wedge angle for fold and thrust belts.
It’s a mood stabilizer. At therapeutic doses it makes the entire world seem grey, and is generally used to help people with enormous uncontrollable emotional swings. AFAIK no studies have been ever done on “microsdosing” it
It took me ages to unlearn that pattern for using systemctl, even though as you say: it's far more consistent
reply