Did you read the article? It’s all about the currency problems and disparate exchange rates that have resulted in the country for the last 20+ years and has nothing to do with the president who’s been there for hardly 2 months. One of his first acts actually tackled that problem by slashing the artificial government exchange rate so that it’s much closer to the true black market rate.
This may indeed be a valid use case, and Bitcoin fulfills it. You don’t need to build a separate blockchain, you just need to know how to embed a hash into a Bitcoin block and how to point to it which is technically easy.
Also it’s unclear how a separate blockchain with this sole function would work. You need the monetary incentive of bitcoin mining and proof of work to make the security model work so that the time stamp can be trusted. The security of the Bitcoin blockchain is not a computer science problem, it’s an economic one. That’s why the only application it works with is cryptocurrency, with time stamping being a nice byproduct.
My phone slipped out of my pocket on the subway on my last night in Tokyo. Realized 20 minutes later, talked to some employees and described what kind of phone it was (a cheap Samsung, really not a big deal), gone as can be. Flew back home to Miami.
Received my phone back in the mail a month later. A friend of mine there kept checking with the employees and it eventually showed up in lost and found. Refused to allow me to pay for the international shipping.
Yes. Start with our lord and savious @zerohedge and go from there. He has a bunch of twitter accounts in his follow list. If zerohedge follows someone, they're generally either important to the news, or they're tweeting about the market every day. You can cull his list and find the gems pretty easily. From there, the list will grow as your interest in the markets grows. Twitter is pretty good about exposing you to the people followed by the people you follow. Easy to expand the network.
"If you rent a server (real or virtual), whose software load you have control over, that's not SaaSS. In SaaSS, someone else decides what software runs on the server and therefore controls the computing it does for you. In the case where you install the software on the server, you control what computing it does for you. Thus, the rented server is virtually your computer. For this issue, it counts as yours."
I'm most curious about applying this distinction to the computing environment today. According to the author it seems Amazon EC2 wouldn't be considered a SaaSS, but Amazon Serverless would? After all you don't control the software loaded in a "serverless" environment, only the business logic. Yet both are hosted in and maintained by Amazon. Amazon, for all intents and purposes, has access to the data coming in and out of there in both cases. So does the distinction hold true, and if it does does it not damage the value of making such a distinction?
Which part is confusing? The browser sends lots of data to the server with each request. The server usually logs at least some of that data. Among other things, that data can be used to generate a subset of the data that is typically gathered by GA and other client-side analytics tools.
