Hacker Newsnew | comments | ask | jobs | submit | Natsu's commentslogin

The politicians are more... interesting... too :)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pOuumGX-6uc

reply

coolandsmartrr 4 days ago | link

For a second, I thought you were alluding to Mac Akasaka.

Turns out this one's just as insane... I can only imagine this being a comedy sketch or something.

reply


I don't know about calling it theft, but some courts have made it into a DMCA violation, though there is disagreement on that point.

reply


It's not a good idea to remove anyone's copyright notices. See, e.g., http://newmedialaw.proskauer.com/2013/08/05/infringing-copyr...

reply

jeremyjh 4 days ago | link

I didn't say that it was. I'm questioning the GP's statement that he is sure this code was shared with subsidiaries - how is that possible?

reply

Natsu 4 days ago | link

I would think that would seem likely, though I can't see how we could be certain without further data.

reply

nwmcsween 4 days ago | link

Do you think the same people / organization that worked on the code administered the systems the resulting binary ran on? I highly doubt it.

reply


> On the night of his arrest, Serge waived his right to call a lawyer. [...] Then he sat down and politely tried to clear up the confusion of this FBI agent who had arrested him without an arrest warrant.

These are things no sane person should do, especially if they're innocent.

reply


I'm not sure that's enough to conclude whether they know of RFC 4343 [1] or not.

[1] http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc4343.html

reply


I don't know about links, but the basics are simple enough: track what you spend and save some % of what you make. Avoid debt for things that lose value (e.g. cars). Debt for things like houses that retain value can make sense, though. Always keep money in reserve. Pay off the high-interest debt (e.g. 30% APR credit cards) first. If you do buy any complex investments, keep in mind what conditions cause gain or loss. For example, I recently saw an annuity/ETF product where they let you invest in indexes and cover the first 10% of any losses, but you gain at most 10% annually (they get the rest). It took me a while to realize that this means you get a 10% upside and 90% downside.

I'm sure others can give you more common sense advice.

reply

jamesaguilar 8 days ago | link

> Avoid debt for things that lose value (e.g. cars).

This is actually not terribly good advice. Debt does not become especially bad depending on whether what you used it for is gaining or losing value.

This rule is really a proxy for, "Don't buy an expensive car, boat, or plane, relative to what you are making." Now that is a good rule. There's no reason to hide it behind a false rule. Financing a purchase that you could pay cash for can sometimes be wise, even if the purchased item is losing value.

reply

Natsu 7 days ago | link

If you fall on hard times, you can sell things. If you have to sell something like a car that lost value, it won't be as good as being able to sell something like a house that holds value.

reply


Thanks for the fun game!

Could you possibly help us by putting in a ruler that marks the map coordinates? Yes, I can read the code to find where things are (or count), but there were a few times where it was somewhat inconvenient.

reply

alnis 9 days ago | link

Thanks for the feedback! We've been thinking about doing that, but the challenge is making it inconspicuous enough to not clash with our minimalist aesthetic.

reply

V-2 9 days ago | link

It could be more discrete, eg. an apostrophe every 10 blocks.

reply

bburky 9 days ago | link

You could just display the coordinates that are currently under the mouse. Adding two changing numbers to the statusbar is fairly minimalist.

reply


There are much better reasons not to use OKCupid than this silly fiasco. I'll let the post by OKCupid that they later removed explain:

http://static.izs.me/why-you-should-never-pay-for-online-dat...

reply

joelrunyon 9 days ago | link

If you think this is about just OKCupid, you're mistaken.

It's about what happens when you start applying micro-judgments arbitrarily that have no discernible relation to their qualifications that that have measured impacts on their livelihoods.

reply


So, something like reiterating his involvement with Mozilla's stance on openness and inclusion (which includes gays), perhaps? Or how they had always been inclusive?

reply

jamesaguilar 9 days ago | link

No. When you publicly take an abhorrent position, it is normally necessary to specifically repudiate that position to remove the doubt in people's minds. Generalities will not cut it.

reply

Natsu 9 days ago | link

> When you publicly take an abhorrent position

Donating to a cause and having the people against it sue to find out the backers (while giving assurances that no retribution is planned) is a very strange case to apply the word "publicly" to.

reply

jamesaguilar 9 days ago | link

I don't understand why you chose to nitpick that word. Do you not believe that his stance is publicly known? That is all that matters for the rest of what I said. He would have to repudiate it specifically. His general statements are insufficient.

reply

Natsu 8 days ago | link

Because this appears to have been planned well in advance.

That lends support to the idea that no one would have believed him no matter what he had said.

reply

jamesaguilar 8 days ago | link

What does? The boycott? You must be joking.

reply


That can be solved without changing the colors of anything, BTW :)

reply

Natsu 9 days ago | link

I just realized that I misread you and it's too late to edit. You're talking about lines of source code (and I do agree, I was really confused on the level where you can only edit a tiny section of code I missed), whereas I thought you were referring to the lasers puzzle (I just moved the exit for that).

reply

More

Lists | RSS | Bookmarklet | Guidelines | FAQ | DMCA | News News | Feature Requests | Bugs | Y Combinator | Apply | Library

Search: