Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | MarceliusK's commentslogin

What investigators often look for isn't just wallet age, but funding patterns, timing, and linkages between wallets

Prediction markets are probably most "accurate" when at least some participants have genuinely superior information

I think this is mixing up two different things: influence and knowledge

In theory maybe, but in practice companies almost always do care about keeping things like release timing, product status or leadership decisions confidential. Even if they haven't publicly announced a policy about prediction markets specifically, it's usually covered under general confidentiality and acceptable use policies

Makes you wonder how much "market accuracy" on these platforms is actually just leakage

Historically, tools that made thinking cheaper didn't eliminate thinkers...


The scary part is that you can't just "hire mastery" on demand. You have to grow it


I'm skeptical that this fully replaces thinking, though. It may replace certain forms of effort, but historically every increase in leverage just shifts where the bottleneck is


At minimum, the default should be "pay exact amount"


The bigger issue, to me, is that the burden is on customers at all. That's what creates all this awkwardness and moral accounting in the first place


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: