Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | KptMarchewa's comments login

>The worst was almost certainly Poland, which had 3.3 million Jews before the war (for reference: 18% of the Jewish population of the world, over 33 percent of that of Europe), killed 82-89% of them

Wow, that was done by Poles in Poland? How did that happen? Certainly the whole nation had to be behind this? [0]

>some German-occupied country in World War Two

Ah, the bare minimum mention at the end.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Righteous_Among_the_Nations#Nu...


I use emails of politicians I don't like.


+1


In many places of the world winter means no or barely any sun. Panels won't help.


It gets interesting with batteries, panels, and spot prices. You can eg. offset (some of) your winter costs in summer. And it does depend on your latitude and local market. It's an interesting optimization problem.


Maybe - but then you end up in a situation like author where delivery costs trump generation, because the additional winter capacity does not come from nowhere. And the actual best case is what happens in California - mass deployment of batteries.


Ah, so ultimately the author did end up paying less. The problem was they were on the wrong plan.

And the optimization problem at this point in time is that -ideally- you want to have some amount of excess generation on your solar panels, then time shift that with batteries to a point in time when power is more expensive, and have some amount of excess capacity in batteries so you can also sell that power; versus the (amortized) cost of that extra capacity; and/or what will actually fit on your roof.

This varies per house/plot, per contract, and per latitude. But in some situations you can end up at net 0 or better.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero-energy_building


>And the optimization problem at this point in time is that -ideally- you want to have some amount of excess generation on your solar panels, then time shift that with batteries to a point in time when power is more expensive, and have some amount of excess capacity in batteries so you can also sell that power; versus the (amortized) cost of that extra capacity; and/or what will actually fit on your roof.

Yep, that's the ideal case - given you're in the region where you have reliable sunshine in the winter. It's not the case where I live, when we had total of 7 hours of sun in December 2023.


The idea would be to sell excess power in summer to offset the cost of buying power in winter.

For sure this won't work equally well everywhere, and I'm not sure if this would still work once practically everyone has solar; but right now it's plausible.


Okay, but the "excess power in summer" does not magically materialize in winter. The current systems where it works like that are accounting trick meant to solar power industry.

In reality, we have no realistic mechanism for long-term energy storage on a grid scale - we barely start to breach scale where storage can handle daily fluctuations - like in California. And it's not free - it's being costly affair.


You're looking at this from a very different angle than I am, I think. While I acknowledge that at the system level we still have a way to go, we're already at the point where individual homeowners can sell power in summer and use that money to offset a significant portion of their winter costs - if they play their cards right. This won't solve all our global or national energy challenges, but it can make financial sense at the individual household level.


7 hours of sun in a month? How do you survive? I think I'd go crazy.


We don't, we go crazy.


>In many places of the world winter means no or barely any sun. Panels won't help.

Good thing those places aren't where the vast majority of the population is located. Your point is basically unrelated to the conversation being had.


> China is rapidly decarbonizing, India is right behind, it is the US you have to convince to move faster (coal plants are rapidly on their way out, but US consumers prefer ICE pickups over EVs, and LNG exports must be prevented and substitutes found [carbon footprint determined to be substantially higher than coal]).

IDK, does not look that way:

https://climateactiontracker.org/countries/china/ https://climateactiontracker.org/countries/india/ https://climateactiontracker.org/countries/usa/ https://climateactiontracker.org/countries/eu/

At best China will stay the same, India will increase emissions, meanwhile both US and EU emissions will significantly drop.


I argue this ignores rate of change of manufacturing capacity and deployment trajectories, but concede all we can do is speculate based on data available today.


It's still better than deliberately incompatible schemes, meaning you can't charge your small device from laptop charger.


I think they mean "USB4 Version2" when it clearly isn't "version 2" but "version 5" or whatever.


Stop reading russian propaganda. There's zero truth in that word salad.


What trusted sources do you have on middle eastern conflicts? The Council on Foreign Relations, The Atlantic Council? Foreign Affairs magazine? These institutions are stocked with neocon stooges whose advice have only invaded half the middle east (always under false pretenses), killed countless innocence, displaced millions, brought "democracy", etc. Scott Horton and antiwar.com have been pumping out real journalism for 20+ years.


My friend, you posted a tweet-rant from a random conspiracy theorist. I think the better question, then, is: What reliable sources do you have? Because this is not one.



No, they haven't.


They critically lack the manpower in the economy, and have to replace all the imports that closed due to sanction. And inflation is already running rampant.

They maybe can do the good old Goebbels "total war" and stop producing consumer goods, but not sure if that's something they want to do.


Their "production" includes restoring stuff from the soviet equipment bases. When they make stuff from scratch, they are as much drip-feeding as west is, or even less - for example they make 6-8 Su-34s a year, while Lockmart is making 156 F-35s a year.


I've personally found newer slightly slower movies like Villeneuve ones are really good.


Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: