To be fair, if the meta verse did succeed, it would've been an amazing play.They were the only serious tech company in the space, they own oculus, and has many of years in the space. I'm sure it was justified with, if this works(20% chance=> trillions of dollars, infinite shareholder value). If this didn't, we ONLY lost 80BN
Just like how currently google via waymo is the leader in autonomous driving.
FYI you might want to do this via [ask hn] to get a more appropriate response.
Regarding your question, there needs to be more context- specifically why do you need an fde that you can’t do via backend engineer. Palantir was special and it’s incorrect to use broad strokes to apply to every company
Thank you! I couldn't figure out how to post there. Guess I need to figure it out! A backend engineer might be OK if they had some solid customer-facing experience as well. I hear your point on Palantir, I just used it as an example because it's so commonly known. The big challenge here is finding people who A) have both skill sets and B) want this kind of role.
"Other surveys suggest less bullying when devices are taken out of the school day."
I'm a little suspicious on this claim, feels very much "phones are the cause of the death of everything in this generation" sort of feel. At least I do not see the link between bullying and being on phones
Being someone who took a month or two to look into mcp servers, I'm geniunely surprised the monetization of mcp servers have not come yet. I was pretty positive as ai agents grow bigger then the need for paid quality servers will surely increase. That said I do understand it's still very early and 99% of people have never heard mcp servers.
My personal take is that mcp servers had very little value outside of info gathering like connecting claude code to supabase to save on token usage. But we'll obv see as the ecosystem develops and people develop new unique servers
Counter point:As a renter, I get faster replies from AI and I don't really mind it, I get the business rational and most of my questions are basic anyways: "what's the pet policy, am I responsible for water and electricity, what's the cost of parking and how many are available".
While the article hints at AI guided tours, I highly doubt that would happen purely to liability or squatting concerns.
Overall the article feels more like a rage piece for anti-ai sentiment rather than a fair constructive criticisms of the prevailing use of AI in the real estate industry
AI makes technical debt so much worse. Speaking from the frontend perspective- reducing technical debt is all about making changeable standardized code. However models change structure, variables names, or changing variables means I'm building a lot of frontend on a shaky foundation. I routinely spend hours a week just fixing weird frontend builds. And as I'm the frontend role, my cofounder doesn't understand design, so I often get messy code
I think that is probably what I'll end up doing. Since the data is text based data. Combined that with the approach of pre analzying quantitative data. To feed to the LLM
I figured I ask this question because there might've been a technique I'm not aware about
Just like how currently google via waymo is the leader in autonomous driving.
reply