Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | FledNanders's commentslogin

Wonderful initiative! Thank you, Mr. Muffett!


> HR is looking for "node.js" but you wrote it like "nodejs"? Though luck pal, bye. HR wants a "computer scientist" but you have a degree in "computer science"? Same, automatically discarded.

Wouldn't those issues be more likely to occur as a result of automated processing? I imagine that most humans who deal with technical hiring would guess that "node.js" and "nodejs" are probably the same thing.


Most humans who deal with technical hiring think that "javascript" and "java" are probably the same thing


Can confirm - I spent a year doing C++ because the recruiter thought it was the same thing as C#.


Java ?? Java-Script ??? Which is which?

http://web.archive.org/web/20171002221201/http://www.jerkcit...

Originally published in October 2002 (almost 20 years ago from when this comment was made, for you future readers and time travellers).


This sounds like an issue of syntax vs semantics, both of which would be relevant to building any sort of fair (as possible) data format.


A standard would include standard forms of expressing things--there shouldn't be anything (other than names) that doesn't appear in their dictionary.


> My band of thugs however would offer people the ability to buy protection from your band of thugs.

Thereby reinventing the police

> I may even be inclined to write down some rules and introduce a process to resolve conflicts without unnecessary damage to people and property.

and the courts.

But maybe that was your point?


Indeed it was :)

With a big enough population at least one government and a basic bureaucracy will be formed by someone.

A few people in the Blockchain space seem to think that technology can fundamentally change that.


Ah, I thought so! And I agree!

I'm hopeful that when the Ponzi schemes fade away, we'll end up with a slightly more informed populace that has inadvertently received an introduction to political science, state-building, the origins of power, etc. Civics teachers take note! :)


Almost the entire populace will be more informed -- except for the Ponzi-"coin" proponents, because they're busy innoculating themselves against reason by... Well, being Ponzi-"coin" proponents; strengthening their own biases by debating in favour of these ludicrous schemes. Like, right here on this page.


It's all about consensus and enforcement. The courts hold power because we all agree (actively or passively) that the decisions made by the courts are legitimate. We choose to keep our citizenships and pay taxes to enforce these decisions with coercive/violent means (police). If people lose faith in this arrangement and start disregarding the legal systems - e.g. if the police refuse to do their job - you could very well end up with blockchain officers taking their place and kicking down doors with the approval of the masses. For now, though, it doesn't really matter what you own on the blockchain because you have no shotgun to back it up (no legitimacy nor means of enforcement).


"Life is what happens to you while you're busy making other plans" - Allen Saunders


> I sign up to Facebook, which costs them money (storage costs, network traffic, CPU, etc) and in exchange they make money off me by showing me ads

How would you explain the fact that police forces, private investigators, credit bureaus, stalkers and intelligence agencies love Facebook if all the company is doing is "showing me ads"?

My point is that you're leaving out the most valuable/terrifying thing that this company does: creating incredibly detailed profiles of nearly every person on the planet including their likes, dislikes, relationships, private thoughts and behavioral patterns.

We may be powerless to change it because developers are easily bribed with FAANG salaries and people generally like their stock portfolios but let's at least be honest about it.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: