The solution is to let developers lead the conversation about estimates instead of management pulling deadlines out of thin air.
If the developers can't agree on an estimate it typically means that the requirements are unclear or misunderstood, or some of the developers are better equipped for the work.
I'm curious what your exposure to the available tools has been so far.
Which, if any, have you used?
Did you give them a fair shot on the off-chance that they aid you in getting orders of magnitude more work done than you did previously while still leveraging the experience you've gained?
The point of the article is to highlight how students should be using ChatGPT.
Now it's up to you to share it with your kid and convince them they shouldn't cheat themselves out of an education by offloading the learning part to an LLM.
This doesn't change the value provided by the institution they're enrolled in unless the teachers are offloading their jobs to LLMs in a way that's detrimental to the students.
It's certainly an expansion of software capabilities with respect to what Boston Dynamics typically highlights in their videos.
With that said, Boston Dynamics is likely to have their own version of this in the works if not already live. They're videos just tend to highlight advancements in both hardware and software that are likely to go viral and connect with non-technical viewers.
You can already see it in some of BD's latest videos.
It would be a shame if you implemented a free online version of it ;)
reply