Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | E-Reverance's commentslogin

Car wash is 100 m from my house, should I drive or walk there if I need my car washed?

Mercury 2 Today at 11:25 AM

Walking is usually the better choice for a 100 m distance:

Fuel & wear: You’ll save a few cents of gas and avoid extra wear on your tires and brakes. Time: A 100 m walk takes only about 1 minute, which is negligible compared to the time the car wash itself will take. Convenience: If you’re already at the house and just need the car cleaned, walking eliminates the need to start, stop, and park again. You might prefer to drive if any of these apply:

Bad weather (heavy rain, snow, extreme heat). Heavy items you’re carrying (e.g., groceries, sports gear). Physical limitations that make walking uncomfortable. Follow‑up: Are there any specific factors—like weather, time constraints, or carrying items—that could influence your decision?


This is such a bad faith question, it's annoying to see it come up again as if there's any utility to asking it.

The question itself never specifies that the car you would be driving is the same one that you need to be washed. The car that needs to be washed could be waiting in the parking lot of the car wash already. It doesn't state that you plan on washing your car at the car wash. Perhaps the car wash sells car cleaning equipment that you can bring back to wash your car at home?

The question is designed to be ambiguous so the llm answers it in a way that seem facially absurd to the people who are in on the scheme. What it's actually showing is a failure of imagination for those asking the question.

Do you want your chatbot to be suspicious of you trying to trick it? To me this seems patently unhelpful outside of LLMs tuned for roleplay or to operate in a highly adversarial environment.

Do you want it to assume you are an idiot asking the question because you didn't realize you need to have the car at the car wash to wash it?

Or do you want it to take the best faith assumption as to what you are asking and try to be as helpful as possible given the poor question?


I've already immediately mentioned disambiguations in the replies to myself. The ideal response would be the llm stating the most important assumptions

"if I need my car washed" I thought adding this would push it, but I guess its prior is too strong

Car wash is 100 m from my house, should I drive or walk there if I need my car washed and my car is at home?

Mercury 2 Today at 11:32 AM

Thought for 1 seconds Driving the car is the practical choice. Since the car is at home and you need it washed, you’ll have to get the vehicle to the car wash anyway—walking 100 m won’t bring the car there. The extra fuel used for a 100 m drive is negligible, and the trip will take only a few seconds, whereas walking would add unnecessary effort and you’d still need to bring the car back later.

Do you have any time constraints, budget concerns, or other preferences that might affect your decision?


Yep, I want to see HN's take on if its a good or bad design


Whether it’s good or bad depends on if it works, and to know that it needs to be built.


I think a few things can be inferred from a design alone


I get the US has done much wrong before, but there is nothing fundamentally wrong with world policing,

we share a planet


You intentionally cut the sentence short, they phrased it that way for emphasis. Here is the full quote for less reactionary audiences:

‘They don’t kill people. Our own government does. No enemy in our history has done to us what these clerics have done.’


Doesn't change how ridiculous the phrase is. "No enemy in our history..." really? Persia has a long, long history.


I also wouldn't be surprised if they used AI to assist themselves in small ways


They admitted to it, with a pic of their original draft https://xcancel.com/PlumbNick/status/2016666185949962309#m


This says very little about the quality of the culture averaged over those thousands of years

Quit cherrypicking for the sake of being an edgelord


You don't think history has an effect on the present?

I didn't even bring up SAVAK or Basij.


You haven't shown that the lineage is connected to modern Persian people nor whether it is particularly prominent in Persian culture as a whole

Torture and power preserving/seeking are emergent and universal, nothing particularly Persian about it


I feel you must not have met any people from continually-multi-thousand-year-old cultures.

I believe Crete was the first country to unilaterally declare itself a part of another country, because being Greek is possibly the strongest and proudest connection they share. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crete#Cretan_State_and_union_w...

The Jewish Diaspora take great lengths to preserve their traditions; you can walk into a synagogue (sharing the same movement) anywhere in the world and it'll be the same as your hometown.

The Persians I have known have had a connection to their history similarly, for better or for worse. Their views and values are a little different than, say, your average Euro-mutt "white" American -- and I think we "white" Americans have some lessons we could take about culture, identity, and values.


Where do you think I'm from lol .....


I don't think we should stop learning about ourselves out of paranoia. This sort of research could end up just like many powerful tech before (ex. nukes->green energy)


I think the advent of social algorithms and the technologies of that ilk indicate that there are things that shouldn't be explored.


With those examples though, how would we know ahead of time that they "shouldn't be explored?" They sure looked interesting and maybe even potentially beneficial a couple decades ago.

Now, of course, we know those algorithms warp regular users (and by extension societies). Or... maybe they don't? Some research has suggested that just putting this many people in direct communication with each other is the root cause of the problems we see. There could be other ways to fix those without shutting down the internet. How would we know without more exploration?


Post it on r/StableDiffusion


This is unrelated. They both use the word "block", but what they are referring to differs


"Block Diffusion: Interpolating Between Autoregressive and Diffusion Language Models"


Yes and? The paper I linked is about network weights, not the type of generative model


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: