> Do you want attribution across generations (50%, 25%, etc.)?
Unnecessary at this time.
> Include discounting or just raw totals?
I am open to your thoughts on this. Raw totals are helpful to me immediately from a valuation perspective, but discounting might be interesting from a visualization perspective. The challenge here is how fertility rate and annual estimated emissions might change over time, the latter based on country level decarbonization/per capita CO2 emissions rate of change over time, forward looking.
> Outputs — just total cost, or also show emissions and breakdown?
Both please.
> Are values user-supplied, or should I include presets (e.g. emissions per person by region)?
User supplied is fine, as that would be the least amount of effort I believe, but if you wanted presets, I can provide most recent total fertility rate and per capita CO2 emissions by country.
Thanks again for your help with this experiment. The goal is to create a valuation modeling tool for fertility through the carbon markets.
Clarify some things for me:
“Offspring emissions” — is that just lifetime emissions of one child, or multiple generations (kids + grandkids)?
Should fertility rate be treated as a simple multiplier, or model population growth (e.g. TFR^n)?
Do you want attribution across generations (50%, 25%, etc.)?
Include discounting or just raw totals?
Outputs — just total cost, or also show emissions and breakdown?
Are values user-supplied, or should I include presets (e.g. emissions per person by region)?
Any other details?