Nope. My point is not about the quality of the generated code, it's the fact that it was generated. No matter how good it is it will always be a liability without the accompanying asset which is the understanding produced by undertaking the effort of writing the code. Generated code is exclusively cognitive debt. It is also, by definition, legacy code since no one wrote it.
Look I hate AI "prose" and "art" with a deep passion, and i refuse to let an LLM touch my documentation, but this idea that you can't use an LLM to write decent code that you genuinely comprehend is outdated. Many developers choose not to, but that doesn't mean it's not possible.
I have coworkers who use an LLM who can explain and defend every line of every PR. I also have coworkers who just prompt and pray. Only one camp is producing genuine liabilities.
reply