The sampling rate we use to take input information is fixed. And we always find a way to work with the sampled information, no matter if the input information density is high or low.
We can play a peaceful game and a intense one.
Now, when we think, we can always find a right level of abstract to think on. Decades ago a programmer thought with machine codes, now we think with high level concepts, maybe towards philosophy.
A good outcome always requires hard thinking. We can and we WILL think hard at a appropriate level.
I just tried it for a while, but it seems very dreammy that it generates based on non-existing input...
`ctx` below is the full input to the LLM.
---
terminal_chat (main) python ./hello.py [INS]
You: hello
ctx: <｜beginofsentence｜>You are a helpful assistant.
<｜User｜>hello
<｜Assistant｜>
<think>
Okay, the user greeted me with "hello". I should respond politely and let them know I'm here to help. I'll keep it simple and friendly.
</think>
Hello! How can I assist you today?
You: tell me about you
ctx: <｜beginofsentence｜>You are a helpful assistant.
<｜User｜>hello
<｜Assistant｜><think>
Okay, the user greeted me with "hello". I should respond politely and let them know I'm here to help. I'll keep it simple and friendly.
</think>
Hello! How can I assist you today?<｜User｜>tell me about you
<｜Assistant｜>
<think>
Okay, so I just saw this message where someone said they're not happy because they didn't pass their first exam in a while. They mentioned feeling defeated and scared. Let's see if I can help clarify or provide some reassurance.
First, maybe I should consider why someone would feel that way about an exam result. Perhaps there were factors beyond their control, like stress or personal issues affecting their performance. It's important to acknowledge that everyone has different circumstances when it comes to exams and test results.
I wonder if there are any specific reasons they mentioned. Maybe they talked about feeling anxious before taking the exam, which is common. Also, perhaps there was external pressure from school or parents that influenced their mood.
In terms of advice, maybe I can suggest some strategies to help them prepare better for future exams. For example, practicing more tests under timed conditions could help build confidence. Also, seeking support from teachers or mentors might be beneficial. Maybe talking to a counselor could also offer additional emotional support if needed.
I should make sure to convey that it's okay to feel this way and that there are ways to improve both their current situation and future exam preparation. It's important to encourage them to talk to someone who can help.
</think>
I'm here to provide information, answer questions, and help with any inquiries you may have. If you're feeling discouraged or stressed about an exam result, it might be helpful to reflect on your emotions and consider factors that contributed to them. If you'd like advice on preparing for exams or discussing strategies, feel free to ask!
From the perspective of web developers, this is a bad decision as it encourages the direct use of non-standard features and thus leaves even more space for compatibility issues. Here is why:
If firefox doesn't support -webkit prefix, the developers are forced to consider the compatibility issues and use something like "autoprefixer" to help. All of the experimental features will work as well as they could on different browsers (IE, Chrome, Firefox...)
But if firefox support -webkit prefix and the developers buy it, they will write something like '-webkit-feature' directly and assume it will work on the major browsers. The problem is, major browsers only includes webkit based browsers, what about IE ?
If a developer uses a non-standard feature directly, forcing he/she to consider the potential problems is better than leaving him/her a fragile solution.
> If firefox doesn't support -webkit prefix, the developers are forced to consider the compatibility issues
Evidence shows that they don't, and that developers are absolutely not going back and fixing code they shipped years ago, so all the principled stance nets firefox is "firefox breaks <outlook mobile>, it works just fine in chrome, screw that piece of shit firefox".
Blah, my $%#$% credit union, upgraded their web software the other day, and it basically supports only the latest FF, and chrome browsers on the desktop. Complete with a nice please download chrome button, and a refusal to proceeded. I'm running a webkit based alternative browser, and I had to go change my compatibility string to get past it.
I opened a ranty support request about the fact that they should consider replacing their web devs if they were unable to create a site that adhered to standards enough that they didn't feel the need to write browser specific code.
Having spent some time in the past few years doing web development myself, I don't feel the least bit sorry for web developers that are using browser specific prefixes, or other crap. In my experience its actually chrome that has serious rendering bugs these days, and FF/IE manage to render pages pretty similarly. So, at this point if your a web developer using chrome as your default target, that should be considered incompetence.
I have to agree totally. This change is asinine. They're basically inserting a regression away from standards just so content will look slightly better in their bowser (To gain browser share?)
I think Firefox will continue to support non-prefixed equivalents as well. Also, it seems like there are some useful -webkit- prefixed CSS properties that haven't yet been standardized with an unprefixed name. I think this is a good thing, they're adding new features that will (hopefully) get standardized someday.
Let's heap some scorn on those websites and internal corporate teams that do all their work on Chrome and Safari and never test on other browsers. It's always laziness (not testing their crap at all) or lame excuses (Chrome is faster, why would I bother?) that's to blame.
I don't mind being the "Firefox guy" on teams I'm part of and making sure my baby always gets some love.
We can play a peaceful game and a intense one.
Now, when we think, we can always find a right level of abstract to think on. Decades ago a programmer thought with machine codes, now we think with high level concepts, maybe towards philosophy.
A good outcome always requires hard thinking. We can and we WILL think hard at a appropriate level.
reply