Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | 0ptr's commentslogin

Ok so basically how we have fun nowadays is

1) write some random control plane 2) create yaml interface for that control plane 3) watch how your users lose will to live

That is fun by definition


I'm sure this was funny in your head, but it was not helpful.


I totally agree that JavaScript can easily end up being a huge mess especially when project grows. Using more strict language like C# can help on that. I have to try this, good job!


There are frameworks and best practices for organizing JavaScript heavy projects. I'm all for solutions to unify front and backend web application development so cheers to Erik for developing this, I've just never been a fan of cross language compilation.


Flash, silverlight, Java, native apps...


Yeah there's no logical equality to machine code and C++ but still people use debuggers. I don't think this is something that cannot be solved.


Is it missing fields for e-mail and logo? Or have you specified this actually somewhere (i.e. not just examples?)

I think this is great idea, however Google has something like this already (microformats based) http://maps.google.com/help/maps/richsnippetslocal/ maybe adopting this would be easier?



AFAIK Vimeo calculates only fully watched videos, so it's 30000 viewers who watched the video to the end.


I've turned free beta mobile application to paid version just by informing people about the change. Offered 40% discount to old users and it started to sell right away (license is around $20). There was people complaining about price but otherwise I got even positive feedback. However conversion rate was not that good but app had several hundreds of thousands users already so it turned out to be business after all (additionally to consumer markets we also sell enterprise versions).

I think it is important to have viable user base, you are going to lose a lot of your existing "customers". They signed up to free version so it is really unlikely that they start paying for it. Also if your free version hasn't attracted that much people, how it would attract if you ask money for it? Do change when you can lose 99% of your free users and still maintain valid business.

And what I almost forgot. You didn't mention what kind of segment you are targeting. Strategy heavily depends of that. If it is enterprise go premium like yesterday, if you are free they are not even interested. Consumers and small businesses are much more difficult.


I suppose it might be important to mention that the free beta was a closed beta... people had to be explicitly invited to use the site for free.

The target customer is businesses/enterprises or other organizations that was to brand their social media presence in one location (starting w/ twitter and eventually including other sources).

the app is http://get.floxee.com/


It doesn't matter whether this is based on pre-iPhone4 data or not. Trend is quite clear and there's simple logic behind it.

Apple has quite narrow market segment. They are making more money with less customers which is exactly the right thing to do from company perspective. However Android is gaining new markets with new form factors, different pricing points etc. That's why it is inevitable.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: