I believe they'll settle on splitting out Youtube - which I believe makes perfect sense and from a rev/valuation perspective, would be a top 20 company.
I found the post interestingly personable, something that I don't often find with Google. I've used Google Scholar for many years, before I used Elsevier and it was a gamechanger.
Consider using a low code platform to test your thesis first. Use a platform like Budibase or something, that's open source, you can self-host and use your own database for security reasons.
I think I was pretty open in my comment (cofounder).
They copied Attio's SVG image and everything. My issue was not the aesthetics but the fact they copied another organization's work. Surely, you don't think that's right?
Annoying but I felt exactly the same. I'd advise you to rename the project - it's still early days and the longer it goes on the harder it will be to change - I've felt this pain.
The term low code is horrible. It's overused, misused and probably created by a marketing team to sell ads.
There are a wide variety of platforms. Some are very open and honest about their core use cases (forms, Crud apps, automations). I work for an open source platform, Budibase, and they're pretty open in re to their use cases.
Others promise the world (SaaS apps, social networks) which are outside of their capabilities and probably not a great investment imo.
Spreadsheets are still dominant, but they're also the reason why many users turn to a low code platform.
For anything complex, for example a SaaS platform, your best bet is to build from scratch with code. The flexibility, ownership and technical viability are essential in these scenarios.
For simple CRUD apps, internal tools, reports, spreadsheet replacement - low-code platforms - particularly OSS options (Budibase, Appsmith, and others)
https://github.com/Budibase/budibase