> A fair argument, but what's the gradual approach?
Site blacklists (a list of sites that should be secure.) Start with all of the banking and payment sites. Then add in sensitive topics to the person's country (eg atheism, homosexuality, piracy, etc.) The list would work a lot like the phishing/malware blacklist.
If anyone has the algorithms and data for that, it'd be Google. Of course, they'd then risk it being easier for governments to demand browsers block content for them. So it's a double-edged sword.
Site blacklists (a list of sites that should be secure.) Start with all of the banking and payment sites. Then add in sensitive topics to the person's country (eg atheism, homosexuality, piracy, etc.) The list would work a lot like the phishing/malware blacklist.
If anyone has the algorithms and data for that, it'd be Google. Of course, they'd then risk it being easier for governments to demand browsers block content for them. So it's a double-edged sword.