In the same article he wonders how there can be eternal growth (the graph up and to the right quote) while limiting the discussion topics to a very small number, but doesn't see the inherent conflict in the demands.
This is a failure to identify audience. A desire for identical "fundamentalist clones". Maybe you just don't get those in a tech audience.
He made it very clear he's not interested in a coffeescript release. Obviously some subculture is... And thats not necessarily a problem.
This probably didn't come through well in the transcript, but his point was that other people (e.g. Slashdot's corporate overlords) wanted the graph to go up and to the right, while Malda wanted to focus on catering to a focused tech audience. He's pointing out the conflict, not ignoring it.
This is a failure to identify audience. A desire for identical "fundamentalist clones". Maybe you just don't get those in a tech audience.
He made it very clear he's not interested in a coffeescript release. Obviously some subculture is... And thats not necessarily a problem.