Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

America is not a direct democracy. The reputation of democracy has been in tatters for two millenniums. (Whether or not it deserves it is another thing entirely.)



The reputation of democracy has been in tatters for two millenniums.? How?


People have been taking swings at democracy in the Athenian sense since, like ever.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trial_of_Socrates


There was no democracy at the time of Socrates it was the Romans and/or the Church.


"In 399, the 'climate of opinion' was no doubt unfavorable to him. Most of the young aristocrats who had flocked round him were dead or discredited, and the leaders of the restored democracy were middle-class 'no-nonsense', rather anti-intellectual business men. They would approve when Meletos (probably a religious bigot, not the same Meletos who arraigned Andokides) undertook a prosecution calculated to force Socrates out of Athens." The Pelican History of Greece, Pg. 306

I admittedly flipped to the index and skimmed until I found that quote, but as I understand it Socrates was executed as a counterrevolutionary by the restored Athenian democracy. (Though the crime they actually charged him with was a little different, to say that the primary purpose of the trial was corrupting the youth of Greece would be like saying that the primary purpose of trying Al Capone was his tax evasion.)


When people say "this country is a democracy, or that country is a democracy", they've obviously referring to the "representative democracy" or a "republic", not direct democracy.

What they mean is a free country, where everyone has equal rights. So you're just arguing semantics. That being said, I do think current "democracies/republics" need a lot more true direct democracy influences in the system, especially US, which has the least direct democracy influences from all the world's republics.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: