because if you are really a coder you prefer negative feedbacks than a false confidence. Even though it is yet socially unacceptable, social rules are stupids.
You cannot earn any glory in publishing your code if people don't tell the truth. To be pleased by one «I love what you do», you should ready yourself to get a couple of «you are doing crap». Coders are not expected to publish good code at first, they are expected to improve their work through sincere feedbacks. That is our culture.
Social norms are unproductive when it comes to work in cooperation.
The fact that Asperger (sociopaths) are 10 times more prevalent in coding expertise might not help.
Excellency in coding is an aristocracy that needs no excuses and don't fear critics. You shall not fear the fight if you believe in your creation, because good design can stand the assault of the best criticisms.
Social norms are only their to protect a hierarchy of status. Truth protect the hierarchy of competence.
If you are just a hipster searching for a social status based on consensus then flee for this is war against you. THIS IS SPARTA!!!!!
The fact that Asperger (sociopaths) are 10 times more prevalent in coding expertise might not help.
This is not an accurate characterization of Asperger syndrome or the hacker community. Wikipedia offers the following definition:
Sociopathy is the result of social conditioning which leads to a lack of natural human values. It refers strictly to a social condition where a person knows, yet has been socially conditioned to disregard, the intrinsic human values which are believed to be universal.
The somewhat similar characteristic of Asperger syndrome is a lack of demonstrated empathy. In the case of a harsh review of someone's project, this could manifest as statements that are accurate from the author's perspective but do not take in to consideration how they might make the reader feel. I don't think being blunt in a review is a sign of disregarding universal intrinsic human values.
Well, I like to exaggerate a little bit. Especially since sociopathy/asperger are rather ill defined. So discard all my remarks as pure troll (don't feed the troll :).
The real point is there are no truly acceptable positive feedbacks if one does not equally express negative feedbacks.
So ... one should not whine for getting flamed even if it is socially unacceptable to discard all this work because that's the path for improving...and later maybe getting praised.
You cannot earn any glory in publishing your code if people don't tell the truth. To be pleased by one «I love what you do», you should ready yourself to get a couple of «you are doing crap». Coders are not expected to publish good code at first, they are expected to improve their work through sincere feedbacks. That is our culture.
Social norms are unproductive when it comes to work in cooperation.
The fact that Asperger (sociopaths) are 10 times more prevalent in coding expertise might not help.
Excellency in coding is an aristocracy that needs no excuses and don't fear critics. You shall not fear the fight if you believe in your creation, because good design can stand the assault of the best criticisms.
Social norms are only their to protect a hierarchy of status. Truth protect the hierarchy of competence.
If you are just a hipster searching for a social status based on consensus then flee for this is war against you. THIS IS SPARTA!!!!!