It appears to be fixed in Linux 3.4 [1]. According to the original commit [2] it...

moe · on July 1, 2012

Which, in summary, is pretty much every production kernel out there.

Spent the last two hours recovering servers, tomorrow will be another interesting day.

Whoever figured it'd be a good idea to INSERT[1] the leap-second instead of just slowing/accelerating time... <censored>

[1] Clock: inserting leap second 23:59:60 UTC

Ecio78 · on July 1, 2012

I'm still tryin to understand why all my servers seem to be ok even if they have kernel that should be affected and some of them are running mysql... For example one of them is a debian kernel 2.6.32 running mysql and ntpd, and i see in dmesg Clock: inserting leap second 23:59:60 UTC but the cpu load is ok...

rplnt · on July 1, 2012

Well, it was a known bug and you had six months to prepare (i.e. update your kernel).

moe · on July 1, 2012

Where was it published?

Almost all of my machines run the Debian stable kernel and were still affected.

rplnt · on July 1, 2012

The leap second was scheduled in January. That event is so unusual you might get worried. So you do a simple google search and find out that there was a critical bug[1] in Linux kernel last time leap second was inserted. People got worried rightfully[2][3]. I don't know about debian, if it was known prior, if it is the same bug as before, ... But I don't run Debian, you do.

1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479765

2. http://it.slashdot.org/story/12/06/30/2123248/the-leap-secon...

3. http://serverfault.com/questions/402087/does-centos-5-4-prop...

moe · on July 1, 2012

No need to be a smart-ass about it.

Even if I had googled (which I didn't) then I'd probably have assumed the fixes for bugs from 2009 to have long made it into the current distro kernels.

I just didn't expect something so basic to be still (or again) broken.

rplnt · on July 1, 2012

Don't get me wrong, I wouldn't too by default. But do you remember Azure crashing on February 29th? And checking for that date is a matter of three conditions. Leap second is much more complex. I'm not trying to be a smart-ass.. I'm just saying it's something I would worry about and would try to find something about it. And perhaps it wouldn't lead anywhere with Debian.

And still, something in your app stack could crash on this as well, leaving the kernel patching pointless.

brongondwana · on July 1, 2012

Pity there was a missing bnx2 firmware issue in all the stables kernels since then, which makes most of the boxes I'm unfortunate enough to run even less useful.

__alexs · on July 1, 2012

> Whoever figured it'd be a good idea to INSERT[1] the leap-second instead of just slowing/accelerating time... <censored>

That would be the IERS organisation. There's going to be a vote in 2015 to abolish them entirely.

sharth · on July 1, 2012

Well, except for RHEL 5. That runs 2.6.18.

glawatscheck · on July 1, 2012

I have 2.6.27 kernels here (SuSE 11.1) which seem unaffected so breakage might be a little later

doki_pen · on July 1, 2012

http://bit.ly/N1kZvS https://twitter.com/redditstatus/status/219244389044731904