I find it interesting Bezos frames stress in this way.
I always have found stress to come from situations with high-variable, high-consequence outcomes. Examples include dangerous situations, performing arts, and one-way door decisions.
Reducing stress is then narrowing variability, reducing consequence severity, some combination of both, or taking temporary breaks from the situation.
What fascinates me then is that Bezos doesn’t think about stress in this way.
>I always have found stress to come from situations with high-variable, high-consequence outcomes. Examples include dangerous situations, performing arts, and one-way door decisions.
I think what he said still holds true in most of these scenarios. In pretty much all of these it is a fear of "what if". If a decision is made and you move forward, the "what if" goes away. You get an answer and can move on to what's next.
Steve Jobs talked about this years ago, in a slightly different context.
Amazon does talk a lot about two-way doors and the need for data-based justification for actions.
However, Bezos' advice typically doesn't apply to normal people. As an example, if a tech worker had been laid off in the past year, having an internal locus of control wouldn't have meaningfully changed much in a landscape where there's little hiring and lots of applicants.
Replace "stress" with "worry" or "anxiety" and this makes a lot more sense to me (maybe Jeff explained this earlier in the video).
Anxiety for me is my brain telling me "there's something to be done, but you're not doing it." Stress, "you're doing that thing that needs to be done, but you're not making any progress."
I liked what Jeff said, but I think stress also, definitely includes things that you don't have present control over. And that is worse, because you don't have immediate solution to it. The thing that you can start doing is easier stress, since you can get rid of it by starting to do that.
He invents his own definition of stress, which makes people responsible for their own stress? Seems dismissive of other people's experiences.
From what I have seen, stress in people is always caused by consequences from actions that they have no control over. The extreme example is playing dice with high stakes, like running over a mine-field.
Control and predictability reduces stress. Exposing people to outcomes of random events increases stress.
In sports or games, players have no control over their opponents, but they should have full control of their own actions. It is possible to play completely without stress.
But being outmatched in games can induce stress; that is, when no available action can improve a player's position.
I always have found stress to come from situations with high-variable, high-consequence outcomes. Examples include dangerous situations, performing arts, and one-way door decisions.
Reducing stress is then narrowing variability, reducing consequence severity, some combination of both, or taking temporary breaks from the situation.
What fascinates me then is that Bezos doesn’t think about stress in this way.
reply